Homeland Security offers details on Real ID

update Hundreds of millions of Americans will have until 2013 to be outfitted with new digital ID cards, the Bush administration said on Thursday in a long-awaited announcement that reveals details of how the new identification plan will work.

The announcement by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security offers a five-year extension to the deadline for states to issue the ID cards, and proposes creating the equivalent of a national database that would include details on all 240 million licensed drivers.

According to the draft regulations (PDF), which were required by Congress in the 2005 Real ID Act and are unlikely to assuage privacy and cost concerns raised by state legislatures:

• The Real ID cards must include all drivers' home addresses and other personal information printed on the front and in a two-dimensional barcode on the back. The barcode will not be encrypted because of "operational complexity," which means that businesses like bars and banks that require ID would be capable of scanning and recording customers' home addresses.

• A radio frequency identification (RFID) tag is under consideration. Homeland Security is asking for input on how the licenses could incorporate "RFID-enabled vicinity chip technology, in addition to" the two-dimensional barcode requirement.

• States must submit a plan of how they'll comply with the Real ID Act by October 7, 2007. If they don't, their residents will not be able to use IDs to board planes or enter federal buildings starting on May 11, 2008.

• Homeland Security is considering standardizing a "unique design or color for Real ID licenses," which would effectively create a uniform national ID card.

Thursday's draft regulations arrive amid a groundswell of opposition to the Real ID Act from privacy groups, libertarians and state officials. On Wednesday, the National Governors Association endorsed a bill by Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, that would reduce Homeland Security's power to order states to comply with the law.

The draft rules, which are not final and will be subject to a public comment period, also include a more detailed estimate of how much it will cost to comply. The National Conference of State Legislatures and other state groups estimated last year that states will have to spend more than $11 billion. But Homeland Security says the total cost--including the cost to individuals--will be $23.1 billion over a 10-year period.

Another section of the 162-page regulations says that states have until December 31, 2009, to certify that they're on the path toward fully complying with the Real ID Act.

Push for repeal continues
Opponents of the Real ID Act, who have been advising states to publicly oppose the system, said that the draft rules are insufficiently privacy-protective and reiterated their call for a repeal of the entire law.

"We still need dramatic legislative action from Congress," said Tim Sparapani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, which runs the RealNightmare.org site. "We've got to wipe out the underlying act."

Sparapani and his allies of more than 50 groups, including the National Organization for Women and United Automobile Workers, sent a letter (PDF) on Monday endorsing a bill to repeal the Real ID Act. The letter says it was a "poorly-conceived law that can never be made to work in any fair or reasonable manner."

The ACLU believes Collins' bill is only a half-hearted step that doesn't go as far as it should. Other proposals include one from Rep. Thomas Allen, a Maine Democrat, that would rewrite the Real ID Act, insert privacy safeguards, and hand $2.4 billion to states over an eight-year period. On Wednesday, Sen. John Sununu, a New Hampshire Republican, and Daniel Akaka, a Hawaii Democrat, reintroduced a broader bill to repeal portions of the existing law.

Some state governments, such as Maine, already have come out against the Real ID Act--a move that effectively dares the federal government to continue even when some states refuse to participate. At least eight states (including Arizona, Georgia, and Vermont) have had anti-Real ID bills approved by one or both chambers of the legislature.

For their part, proponents of the Real ID Act say it's designed to implement proposals suggested by the 9/11 Commission, which noted that some of the hijackers on September 11, 2001, had fraudulently obtained state driver's licenses. But not all did: at least one hijacker simply showed his foreign passport and walked onto the airplane that day.

The Bush administration and many congressional Republicans have defended the Real ID Act as a way to stop future terrorist attacks and deter illegal immigrants.

"Raising the security standards on driver's licenses establishes another layer of protection to prevent terrorists from obtaining and using fake documents to plan or carry out an attack," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said in a statement. "These standards correct glaring vulnerabilities exploited by some of the 9/11 hijackers who used fraudulently obtained drivers licenses to board the airplanes in their attack against America."

A 23-page report released this week by Janice Kephart, a former lawyer with the 9/11 Commission, defended the Real ID Act by calling it a "significant step in enhancing our national and economic security and our public safety." Kephart is now president of 9/11 Security Solutions.

States bowing out of Real ID requirements is "not the way to secure America," the report says. "Embedding identity security into state-issued (ID card) systems will take significant planning to fulfill the requirements of Real ID and significant financial resources for the 'brick and mortar' start-up costs. Congress must step up to the plate and make securing of identity documents the national priority that our citizens deserve."

The Real ID Act passed Congress as part of an $82 billion military spending bill that also included funds for tsunami relief. No up-or-down vote on solely the Real ID Act took place in the entire Congress, though the House of Representatives did approve the rules by a 261-161 vote.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Federal government

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Security

Create an email alert | RSS feed

RFID

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Privacy

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Real ID Act, homeland security, ID card, RFID, Maine

91 comments (Page 1 of 5)
240 million licensed drivers?
by Marcus Westrup March 1, 2007 11:36 AM PST
With an (estimated) population of 300 million? Either people are getting licenses very young, driving until they are very old, or there are a lot of bogus licences out there! The system may be broken before it ever gets started.
Reply to this comment
BackDoor
by BattleAce7101 March 1, 2007 11:48 AM PST
They backdoored this thing. We should not be forced to abide by something that was introduced so deceptively. Let's get the vote of the people on this. They knew the people would never let this pass but we are too damn busy or lazy to do anything about it. We are frogs boiling slowly.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
And again,
by starch_y March 1, 2007 12:17 PM PST
Yet another disgraceful act by an amoral administration trying to pass itself off as a paragon of virtue. The way it was stuck on a critical defense spending bill and crammed down the collective throat of the states shows how dishonorable a group this is. Your papers, please?
Reply to this comment View reply
Steal This ID - PLEASE!
by mstrhypno March 1, 2007 1:05 PM PST
Unencoded bar codes, scannable and readable by ANY bar code reader, containing your home address. HOW NICE! So, when I am on the road, doing a show tour, or on vacation, the nice people who like to break in to houses will KNOW that I am away FROM home, WHERE home IS and, thanks to the US GIVErment, will be able to clean me and millions of other Americans out of everything they own! And, if they put the RFID chips in there, sure as hell's a mantrap, some smart young hacker will crack THAT code and people will be able to scan these puppies from a distance and do the SAME THING, but you won't even know that you have BEEN scanned! And, for those who say these things can't BE hacked - BULL! ANYTHING can be hacked. Remember, the codes ON these critters have to be simple enough to be read FAST or the lines at airports and federal buildings will be even worse - and the public will NOT put up with THAT! Americans will tolerate almost anything so long as it doesn't screw up traffic. If the code on the RFID chips on the "Real IDs" is too complex, they most certainly WILL screw up traffic! And the public will NOT put up with that - STARTING with the Congresscritters who PASSED this nonsense and who will be among the FIRST to get caught in the mess that they will CAUSE!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Every breath you take, Every move you make...
by Mark Greene March 1, 2007 1:54 PM PST
Ben Dover for Big Brother And the point of Real ID is....? Oh right, complete tracking of everyone. Seriously, we're so asleep that this will kick in with barely a wimper. It goes without saying that the motivation for this goes way beyond terrorism. Won't it be nice when you can essentially be deactivated remotely? And if they keep screaming "terrorism" they'll be able to do so without any real probable cause. How nice.
Reply to this comment
No Thanks!
by FreeMarket March 1, 2007 1:58 PM PST
A license is for driving. Period.
Reply to this comment
No Thanks!
by FreeMarket March 1, 2007 1:58 PM PST
A license is for driving. Period.
Reply to this comment
My CA Drivers License has my address on it
by d21mike March 1, 2007 1:59 PM PST
Since my CA Drivers License already has my address on it, is the problem with the scanning and not the address? I can understand the RFID problem but not sure about the scanning part. Or is the complaint that CA will be part of a central database. If the DL did not have the ability to SCAN or RFID would it be ok with eveybody to have a US DL instead of a CA DL. Not sure I have a problem with that. Am I missing something else. Thanks.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
creepy
by cielazur March 1, 2007 2:10 PM PST
it's just plain creepy.
Reply to this comment
RE: Homeland Security offers details on Real ID
by protagonistic March 1, 2007 2:45 PM PST
Is there anyone in this discussion that actually feels this is going to make our country safer?
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
EarthLink ditches Philly Wi-Fi network
Craigslist files lawsuit against eBay
A reminder of why Microsoft wanted Yahoo
Online ads showing signs of economic wear?
Facebook pulls 'stalker list' tool
Most Popular Stories
Welcome to the social mess?
HP in talks to buy EDS
HP to acquire EDS for $13.9 billion
Mac Office sales soar on Apple's gains
'Grand Theft Auto IV' nets Guinness record
Resource center from News.com sponsors
You can do more when your phone runs Windows®
Windows Mobile

See it all at StartDoingMore.com Start Doing More

Start doing more
Get More Done with Windows Mobile

There's so much more you can do when your phone runs Windows. StartDoingMore.com>

Familiar Microsoft Software and Services

With a Windows Mobile phone, your easy-to-use Microsoft software go wherever you go.

Choose the perfect phone for you

Side, flip, qwerty, touchscreen? See More>

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.34%) -44.13 12,832.18
S&P 500 (-0.04%) -0.54 1,403.04
NASDAQ (0.27%) 6.63 2,495.12
CNET TECH (-0.06%) -0.99 1,744.82
  Symbol Lookup
Update your drivers with Version Tracker Pro
Learn more about Version Tracker Pro

advertisement
On TechRepublic: Top 5 operating systems you never used
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: