- Related Stories
-
A motorcycle that's fast, silent and green
August 2, 2007 -
New player in clean tech: Gulf oil money
May 14, 2007 - Related Blogs
-
Why did Toyota kill the electric car? Slow sales
January 25, 2007
The Javlon, from Southern California's Miles Automotive, will go 120 miles before it needs a charge and will hit a top speed of 80 miles an hour, according to CEO Jeff Boyd. It will cost approximately $32,000, and its lithium ion battery will last more than 100,000 miles before it needs to be replaced.
The company hopes eventually to come out with other models that will accelerate faster and go farther on a single charge.
Although Miles is based in the U.S., the car will be assembled in China, and most of the key components, such as the battery, will come from there as well. The basic chassis of the Javlon, in fact, is already being used for a gas car by another company in China. (U.S. carmakers get parts from China but assemble them elsewhere, and Chinese companies do not import street cars in large numbers to the U.S.)
China isn't exactly identified with high-quality manufacturing these days, but Boyd and other executives assert that Chinese doesn't mean cheap or shoddy. The chassis was actually designed by Italian designer Pininfarina.
The battery also comes from a well-known vendor. "We're buying it from one of the premium battery manufacturers in China," he said.
Over the next three years, the world will get a chance to see if it's really ready to embrace electric cars. General Motors, Toyota, Honda and Ford all brought out electric vehicles in the 1990s--only to yank them off the market because of dismal sales. Some of the current crop of electric car designers and execs also assert that these early cars weren't very good.
Since then, better batteries, higher oil prices and global warming have brought the idea back into vogue. Tesla Motors will bring out a $98,000 sports car later this year.
Selling sedans
Meanwhile, a whole host of companies--including Think, Zap, Tesla and Phoenix Motorcars--hope to bring out sedans for the mainstream market. (Others, such as India's Reva, are aiming for the economy market, while Zero Motorcycles and Vectrix are selling electric two-wheelers.)
The sports cars are being sold on the basis of speed and acceleration, an advantage that comes from having an electric motor. Marketing sedans is a bit trickier. The sedans will range in price from $30,000 to $50,000, and most will only be able to go about 100 to 150 miles before needing a charge.
Will Americans pay that much for a car that might not get them away for a quick weekend trip without conking out? Nobody knows, but Boyd notes that most Americans commute only about 40 miles a day and that a lot of people have second cars they use only for commuting.
"We don't expect this to be most people's primary car," he said.
Charge time is another issue. The battery in the Javlon will take 8 to 10 hours to fully charge. That's significantly longer than the charge times touted by other manufacturers--the Tesla Roadster, which comes with a fairly large battery, charges in about 4 hours. Boyd says that customers will become acclimated to thinking about charging every time they park.
The Santa Monica company was founded by Miles Rubin, an executive-turned-entrepreneur and a philanthropist. About three years ago, he was at an automotive conference with now-Chief Marketing Officer David Hirsch. They listened to two engineers argue about the feasibility of hydrogen cars. One said hydrogen cars would hit in about 18 years.
"He turned to me and said '18 years? I'll be dead in 18 years. What can we do in 18 months?'" Hirsch recalled.
The company has already come out with low-speed vehicles that top out at 25 to 35 miles per hour. They are sold to college campuses, industrial sites and the military. The Department of Defense is replacing a number of conventional cars with low-speed vehicles. Retirement communities, which have seen a rash of accidents among their golf cart-commuting residents, are another target market.
The company has already come out with low-speed vehicles that top out at 25 to 35 miles an hour. They are sold for use on college campuses, industrial sites and military posts--the Department of Defense is replacing a number of conventional cars with low-speed vehicles. Retirement communities, which have seen a rash of accidents among their golf cart-commuting residents, are another target market.
"There are about 70,000 low-speed vehicles in the U.S. today," Boyd said.
To date, Rubin has put about $15 million to $20 million into the company. Venture capital firms have not invested in it.
The first prototypes are currently being finished in China, and Miles hopes to bring them to the U.S. for testing and to show potential dealers by September. The company will then begin the rigorous, and somewhat expensive, process of testing required by the U.S. government and the EU.
If all goes well, Miles will begin to sell cars in the fourth quarter of 2008. For the first year of production, it has set a goal of producing 18,000 cars, and for the second year, 38,000. An SUV-like car will follow, ideally, in 2010.
If electric cars are such a good idea, what will prevent the big companies from coming in and taking over? Size, says Boyd, who has owned and run several car dealerships. Unless big automakers believe they can sell 200,000 units of a new model, they won't make it, he said.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
China
Automotive
Alternative energy
See more CNET content tagged:
sedan,
mile,
China,
Southern California,
car



- Wow! All the oil company shills are out in force on this site!
-
by kurtvo
August 12, 2007 9:13 AM PDT
- Wow, the comments are this article are just chock full of the standard oil company bulls$$t! The shills are earning their paychecks today! It's sad because a casual reader with a curiousity about electric cars might read these comments and think that there are all kinds of real obstacles.
Let's debunk the shills, shall we?
LIE #1: "Electric cars just shift the oil/coal burning to the utilities so there would be no benefit-- or maybe even worse pollution!"
Answer: This is a bald-faced lie cooked up by electric car opponents (oil companies, etc). It is repeated ad nauseum by the shills without any research or facts to support it. Acutal facts and research reports demonstrate that electric cars (EVs) are 5-10 times as effecient as gasoline cars. Why? Gasoline engines are very ineffecient, losing much of their eneregy to heat. Plus gasoline takes a lot of energy to be refined from oil, then pumped into trucks, then trucked all around the country. Think about how much gas is burned just moving gasoline to the service stations! Electric motors are extremely effecient, the distribution system is already in place (the energy grid), and EVs use no power when stationary (other than heat/cooling) and regain power when slowing/going down hills. Per mile, an EV "burns" just 10-20% of the oil a gasoline would require.
Oh, while we're on this subject, the oil company shills always forget to mention that electric cars don't need oil changes, saving another 20-30 quarts of oil per car per year. Multiply that by the millions of cars on the road and you have a huge savings, not to mention saving the environment from this toxic oil waste.
LIE #2: "Electric Cars will overwhelm the power plants, and cause them to spew more pollution."
NOT TRUE: There is an enormous amount of unused capacity at power plants at night. According to a California utility (CAL EDISON) there is at least enough exess nighttime capacity right now to support 1 million or more EVs. And pollution? Controlling that is FAR, FAR easier and more effecient when it takes place in one location (an electric power plant) than when spread out over millions of gasoline engines.
LIE #3 "Big Auto gave electrics an honest attempt but the public wasn't interested" This is only partially a lie. GM gave the EV1 a half-hearted attempt, just to satisfy California's zero emmissions laws. But the fact was, in the 90's and up until recently there was far, far more money in building big SUVs. Was there a big conspiracy with Big Oil to kill the EVs? Maybe, but good old greed was probably the biggest factor.
LIE #4: "Battery technology isn't there yet" This is an outrageous lie considering electric cars that will be in production this year get 120-200+ miles per charge. That's plenty for 99% of daily drives. But what about if you need to drive farther than 200 miles? Well, battery technology ALREADY EXISTS (Nanosafe, A123) that allows for 10 minute or less recharges. Equip a few highway gas stations with high-powered chargers and the problem is solved. And with lower manufacturing costs and evolving technology you might get to the point where you can travel 500+ miles on a charge and not need the gas/charge stations at all. Imagine that... No gas stations needed! Maybe just a few mobile emergency stations with chargers for the occasional breakdown/failure. THIS WOULD BE A NIGHTMARE FOR THE OIL COMPANIES.
All the technology for electric cars-- including batteries and rapid charging solutions-- already exists. They could be deployed TODAY... if there were the political will and forsight to do it. And if the powerful interests of the oil companies weren't fighting it every inch of the the way.
-
Reply to this comment
View
all 2 replies
-
-
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>