- Related Stories
-
Oil giant BP invests in microbe specialist
June 14, 2007 -
Fast-food fat: Future fuel for cars
February 8, 2007 -
Playing science's genetic lottery
April 12, 2006
Microorganisms can be used to metabolize glycerol--one of the primary byproducts in converting vegetable oil or animal fat into biodiesel--into high-value products, said Ramon Gonzalez, the William Akers Assistant Professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
Gonzalez and a group of students, for instance, have identified a process in which Escherichia coli, in an oxygen-free environment, will convert glycerol into ethanol. The strain of E. coli currently being used in the experiments isn't genetically modified or enhanced, which could further enhance yields.
The glycerol could also be converted into different types of industrial acids, which could even be more profitable than ethanol.
The research, which is attracting investors and companies interested in licensing the technology, could help take some of the risk out of the growing biofuel business. Start-ups and established companies are sinking hundreds of millions of dollars into building biodiesel refineries and ethanol plants.
Unfortunately, turning a profit isn't easy, even with subsidies that range from 50 cents to $1 a gallon. Both biodiesel and ethanol are dependent upon feedstocks such as palm oil, sugar cane, and corn, which can fluctuate wildly in price and erode margins. Corn has doubled in price, from $2 a bushel to $4 a bushel, in the U.S. in the past year and whacked the profits of ethanol producers. Increased biodiesel demand is expected to make cooking oil prices spike in the coming years.
To remain economically viable, these companies have to be able to sell their byproducts. In biodiesel, that's become tough to do because of the sudden glut in supply. Glycerin (also known as glycerol), which is sold to cosmetics companies, went for about 25 cents a pound 18 months ago, said Gonzalez. Now it sells for about 2 to 3 cents a pound--when sellers can find buyers. For every 10 pounds of biodiesel produced, refiners are left with about a pound of glycerin. (Oil in industrial processes gets measured in pounds.)
"This could help biodiesel a lot," he said. "When they design their economic models, they count on selling the glycerin."
Ethanol produced from glycerin could also be more economical than producing it out of corn, the main feedstock for ethanol in the U.S., or than cellulosic ethanol, which is made out of wood chips and waste vegetable matter. Gonzalez hopes a prototype production process for making glycerin ethanol will be in place by the end of the year, meaning it could come to market earlier than cellulosic ethanol. Mascoma will try to open a small cellulosic plant by early 2008 and New Zealand is investing in the concept. But most believe cellulosic ethanol is still at least a few years away.
During the past three years, microorganisms have begun to be more actively enlisted for industrial production. Microbes, after all, are essentially miniature chemical factories: they ingest materials, break them down with enzymes and turn out byproducts. Brewers and pharmaceutical manufacturers have exploited microorganisms for years, but now they are being drafted for other types of work. Some companies have also figured out ways to re-create microbial processes in the lab in the growing field of synthetic biology.
Cambrios Technologies has come up with a biologically inspired enzyme that can be used to add insulating layers to semiconductors. Meanwhile, companies such as LS9, Gevo and Synthetic Genomics are trying to harness microbes for energy production.
And why use E. coli, the microorganism usually associated with stomach pains? It's one of the most extensively studied microbes, and several techniques for genetic modification have already been developed with it. Gonzalez and others call it the workhorse of microbiology.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
Biofuel
Alternative energy
See more CNET content tagged:
biodiesel,
professor,
U.S.
- It sounds like we are planting ourselves into a corner
- There just simply isn't enough farmland for this biodiesel or ethanol to work. Run the numbers yourself and while your doing that keep an on the price of milk, cheese, cooking oil, beef. This rush to ethanol and biodiesel is a mistake. You should not let your tax dollars go toward another dead end situation. From what we have read only the large-scale ethanol and biodiesel plants are making money off of this latest energy carrier and that is coming at the taxpayers expense if supporting an inefficient energy capture. Corn only captures .02% of the suns energy!
- Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
- I1%, 5 %, 85% they are all driving up the cost of food
- And we may be polluting more to convert the plant to fuel than the energy it gives us. If it is an energy loss to create ethanol it doesn?t matter if the percent is 1, 5, or 85, or even 100. For every gallon you mix in you are creating an energy loss for the planting, farming, and distribution of the fuel. This is because photosynthesis in the corn plant is only .02% efficient in capturing the suns energy. That means you simply need too many acres of corn to make a difference. Sure it may be good for the farmer but it is a financial loss without subsidies, and an energy loss even when you take the money out of the picture. Run the numbers, compare to the efficiency of even low-grade solar cells. Direct capture of the suns energy by highly efficient solar cells will be the answer. Ethanol is just a temporary patch or additive to oil to keep the oil flowing. When we run out of oil ethanol or other fuels from plants wont be able to cut it. We need to come up with a sustainable/renewable energy capture that will not starve out humans. Oil and Gas had millions of years to collect for our pleasure. Calculate how many acres we will need to move our cars around and you will see that we are heading down the wrong road.
- Reply to this comment View reply
- ethanol etc.
- the great lie is that ethanol etc. is the solution to fuel and pollution problems! if you factor in the cost of production, loss of food area, pollution created, rise in cost of food,and reduced BTU derived,and government subsidies, with little overall reduction of pollutants....it does not make sense. the real solution is 1)reduced consumption (more efficient cars), 2)greater tax on fuel with tax breaks for better milage cars, money to be spent on research. 3)a real effort by government and industry to improve the situation! I am not confident this will happen untill a severe crisis occurs!
- Reply to this comment View reply
- Oil lovers
- You are right. They are spin doctors for oil companies. I wonder how many oil execs send their kids to Iraq to have a bomb mame or kill them. What is the cost of oil? I like our farmers and hard working midwesterners having a good future with a good product. It is only the beginning and it will get much better. We must fight the insanity of pumping huge amounts of oil until we run out. I am not against oil, I just want something in the future that looks good for the USA other than making terrorist countries wealthy.
- Reply to this comment
... or log in manually to your email client and click the link in our email. Once you have confirmed your registration, please log in.



