- Related Stories
-
Open-source hunt digs up more flaws
May 3, 2006 -
LAMP lights the way in open-source security
March 6, 2006 -
Homeland Security helps secure open-source code
January 10, 2006 -
Key bugs in core Linux code squashed
August 3, 2005 -
Wide-ranging flaw crashes programs
July 7, 2005 -
Open-source LAMP a beacon to developers
June 14, 2005
The effort, supported by a research contract from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, is now scanning code of 150 open-source projects, up from the original 50.
"This allows open-source developers to find and resolve defects introduced into the project," David Maxwell, open-source strategist for Coverity, said in a statement. Coverity makes source-code analysis tools and shares the DHS contract with Stanford University and Symantec.
Since the start of the project, 6,000 bugs that were found have been fixed, according to Coverity. About 700 developers are now registered to access the bug data and 35 million lines of code are scanned every day, the company said.
New open-source projects added to the bug hunt effort include "zlib," a compression program used in many applications, as well as FreeRadius, an application that provides authentication.
Coverity has updated its scan.coverity.com Web site to give a graphical overview of the flaws that were found. The company plans to further increase the number of open-source projects it scans. It has yet to decide which ones.
The bug hunt is part of a three-year "Open Source Hardening Project" dedicated to helping make such software as secure as possible. In January 2006, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security awarded $1.24 million to Stanford, Coverity and Symantec to find vulnerabilities in open-source projects.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
Flaws
Government
Open source
See more CNET content tagged:
Coverity,
open source,
open-source project,
project,
bug
- Putting the bug before the horse...
- It's a lovely idea, but in the great scheme of things, most open-source software is written for naturally-hard root programs like Unix, so most bugs would not be security-related. Since 95% of the desktops in the US are running Microsoft products which have more known serious bugs (but, as the earlier CNET article pointed out, fewer security bugs overall), shouldn't they be doing something about deconstructing Windows problems? Any serious homeland security issues which arise on "the internets" are more likely to be Windows proprietary issues than open-source issues...
- Reply to this comment
... or log in manually to your email client and click the link in our email. Once you have confirmed your registration, please log in.
