Larry Ellison, CEO, Oracle |
Last hurrah for PeopleSoft?
After Oracle's court victory, customers will look for reassurance at what could be PeopleSoft's last annual user conference.
September 20, 2004
PeopleSoft sweetens severance packages
In a move to retain employees, the software maker quadruples the size of the minimum severance package for employees.
September 19, 2004
Oracle ruling highlights complexity of market
news analysis Business-software maker's antitrust victory may pave way for accelerated merger activity in overcrowded IT markets, experts say.
September 13, 2004
PeopleSoft aims to keep worker morale high
Six days before the Oracle ruling, PeopleSoft sped up the vesting terms for its workers' 2004 merit-based stock options, according to an SEC filing.
September 13, 2004
|
trial coverage
Oracle case bounces to Europe
Judge rules in favor of Oracle
Ruling turns up heat on PeopleSoft
Read the ruling
PeopleSoft flap may hurt Oracle's image
Traders bet on Oracle
Judge moves to unseal documents in Oracle case
Judge grills Oracle, DOJ in closing arguments
DOJ, Oracle write up opposing views
Judge's order may be good for Oracle
Oracle, DOJ file antitrust legal briefs
Ellison's defining moment
No clear winner in antitrust trial
Oracle rests case as trial winds down
Ellison: 'Radical' industry shift drove bid
Microsoft details SAP buyout plan
PeopleSoft CEO won't testify
PeopleSoft, Oracle talked merger in detail
Oracle-PeopleSoft rivalry fueled innovation
Microsoft executive cites expansion worries
Market matters spurred Microsoft-SAP talks
Oracle moves to blunt Microsoft testimony
PeopleSoft CEO blasts Ellison's 'jealousy'
Oracle's lengthy shopping list
For Oracle, a range of acquisition targets
Oracle president backpedals on 'oligopoly'
Economist: Oracle-SAP duopoly would hurt market
Documents show PeopleSoft feared Microsoft
Testimony: SAP, Microsoft would keep Oracle in check
Automaker cites customer costs of PeopleSoft takeover
Govt. witnesses decry lack of choices
Oracle judge won't bar disputed witnesses
Judge vows 'tougher line' on testimony
Trying a 'landmark case'
DOJ: Big three rule corporate market
Offer holds risks for early takers
Oracle sees plenty of competitors
Oracle hits hard at Justice Dept.'s case
Microsoft, SAP mulled merger
Trade group favors Oracle in DOJ suit
Takeover attempt takes its toll
Start marking your trial score card
Attorneys sketch schedule for Oracle trial
Oracle, Justice submit final witness lists
EC regulators delay Oracle decision
Oracle outlines case for antitrust fight
U.S. to block Oracle's bid
Oracle makes 'final' bid for PeopleSoft
PeopleSoft extends money-back guarantee
Oracle vs. PeopleSoft
|
Oracle - DOJ FAQ
Will the government appeal the ruling?
For now, the U.S. Justice Department says it is reviewing its options. It has 60 days from U.S. Judge Vaughn Walker's Sept. 9 ruling to file an appeal. The decision against the Justice Department could make future enforcement of antitrust law in high-tech markets tougher. An appeal is probable because there are few antitrust precedents in the software industry, and some of the economic theories introduced in the case have rarely been challenged in court. All this makes proper application of the law in this case subject to debate, antitrust attorneys said.
When is an appellate court likely to issue a decision?
Is the Oracle-PeopleSoft merger now certain? If the deal continues as a hostile takeover, Oracle's next obstacle is PeopleSoft's "poison pill." The company is suing PeopleSoft in an effort to revoke the anti-takeover provision. That trial is scheduled for Sept. 27. If it loses that case, Oracle could launch a proxy battle for control of PeopleSoft's board at the company's annual shareholder meeting next spring.
What about the European Union? Isn't it still reviewing the deal?
Where does PeopleSoft stand?
Why did Oracle and the Department of Justice go to court? Oracle decided to challenge the suit, the first time a high-technology company has fought a government decision to block a merger since SunGard Data Systems, a disaster recovery company, defeated a Justice Department injunction blocking its $825 million acquisition of Comdisco's disaster recovery assets in 2001.
Why does the U.S. government oppose Oracle's takeover plan?
Why does Oracle want to acquire PeopleSoft?
When and where was the trial? The Justice Department relied heavily on the testimony of corporate software buyers, including Verizon Communications, PepsiCo, DaimlerChrysler, the state of North Dakota and New York's Erie County. Many of the customer witnesses frowned on the proposed merger, saying it would leave them with too few choices. The trial also led to the revelation that Microsoft had held preliminary merger talks with SAP. Oracle offered the talks--abandoned well before the trial began--as proof that Microsoft intends to become a direct competitor in the business applications market. Other highlights included testimony from Oracle CEO Larry Ellison and President Safra Catz.
In which market do Oracle and PeopleSoft compete?
Who are the other players? |