• On The Insider: Sexiest Magazine Covers of All Time

November 22, 2007 10:38 AM PST

Panel urges FCC to cap rural phone subsidies

Panel urges FCC to cap rural phone subsidies
Related Stories

Senators oppose plan to curb phone taxes

June 12, 2007

Senators back new broadband taxes

February 28, 2006

New taxes could slam Net phone users

August 23, 2005

FCC investigates phone, Net subsidy fund

June 15, 2005
Related Blogs

New Net phone taxes on the way?


June 1, 2006

Recommends allowing some of the ballooning funds to be used instead for promoting broadband service.

The story "Panel urges FCC to cap rural phone subsidies" published November 22, 2007 at 10:38 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 14 comments
Republican "tax cuts"
by michaelo1966 November 22, 2007 1:04 PM PST
This is the real story of Bush and government control by the Republicans. Their version of "tax cuts" includes the doubling of this "subsidy" while they controlled the government. The subsidy happens to look a lot like a tax -- people have no choice but to pay it -- and goes almost directly to Republican donors (no doubt stopping in the government coffers just long enough to keep some loyal Bushies employed).
Reply to this comment
Republican "tax cuts"
by michaelo1966 November 22, 2007 1:04 PM PST
This is the real story of Bush and government control by the Republicans. Their version of "tax cuts" includes the doubling of this "subsidy" while they controlled the government. The subsidy happens to look a lot like a tax -- people have no choice but to pay it -- and goes almost directly to Republican donors (no doubt stopping in the government coffers just long enough to keep some loyal Bushies employed).
Reply to this comment
The Program Worked, So End It!
by skshrews November 22, 2007 7:46 PM PST
How about a bold idea for the Feds: since the original program did what it was designed to do (bring landline phone service to rural areas), let's end it!

Of course, this is the natural life cycle of any
Reply to this comment
The Program Worked, So End It!
by skshrews November 22, 2007 7:46 PM PST
How about a bold idea for the Feds: since the original program did what it was designed to do (bring landline phone service to rural areas), let's end it!

Of course, this is the natural life cycle of any
Reply to this comment
The Program Worked, So End It!
by skshrews November 22, 2007 7:47 PM PST
How about a bold idea for the Feds: since the original program did what it was designed to do (bring landline phone service to rural areas), let's end it!

Of course, this is the natural life cycle of any Federal program: to bloat in size.
Reply to this comment View reply
The Program Worked, So End It!
by skshrews November 22, 2007 7:47 PM PST
How about a bold idea for the Feds: since the original program did what it was designed to do (bring landline phone service to rural areas), let's end it!

Of course, this is the natural life cycle of any Federal program: to bloat in size.
Reply to this comment View reply
Missing the big culprit
by solrosenberg November 23, 2007 2:07 PM PST
Nice how the article completely ignores the free conference call and free international long distance businesses that have sprung up to exploit these subsidies. Ever wonder why all of those services have numbers in Iowa or Nebraska? If you can set up a service and get people to call your Iowa number, you are guaranteed a profit at taxpayer expense.
Reply to this comment
Missing the big culprit
by solrosenberg November 23, 2007 2:07 PM PST
Nice how the article completely ignores the free conference call and free international long distance businesses that have sprung up to exploit these subsidies. Ever wonder why all of those services have numbers in Iowa or Nebraska? If you can set up a service and get people to call your Iowa number, you are guaranteed a profit at taxpayer expense.
Reply to this comment
blaming taxes for high line costs
by jmv2007 November 24, 2007 10:29 AM PST
In Holland I only need to use my cell phone once per year to keep it alive. In the US I need to spend 100$ a year, for the same 'service'. To add a line to an existing plan? 10$ per month! My entire Dutch plan is 7 euro! Why is it so much more expensive in the US? Because of the stupid per line per month charges!
Reply to this comment View reply
blaming taxes for high line costs
by jmv2007 November 24, 2007 10:29 AM PST
In Holland I only need to use my cell phone once per year to keep it alive. In the US I need to spend 100$ a year, for the same 'service'. To add a line to an existing plan? 10$ per month! My entire Dutch plan is 7 euro! Why is it so much more expensive in the US? Because of the stupid per line per month charges!
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right