Passports to get RFID chip implants

update All U.S. passports will be implanted with remotely readable computer chips starting in October 2006, the Bush administration has announced.

Sweeping new State Department regulations issued Tuesday say that passports issued after that time will have tiny radio frequency ID (RFID) chips that can transmit personal information including the name, nationality, sex, date of birth, place of birth and digitized photograph of the passport holder. Eventually, the government contemplates adding additional digitized data such as "fingerprints or iris scans."

Over the last year, opposition to the idea of implanting RFID chips in passports has grown amidst worries that identity thieves could snatch personal information out of the air simply by aiming a high-powered antenna at a person or a vehicle carrying a passport. Out of the 2,335 comments on the plan that were received by the State Department this year, 98.5 percent were negative. The objections mostly focused on security and privacy concerns.

But the Bush administration chose to go ahead with embedding 64KB chips in future passports, citing a desire to abide by "globally interoperable" standards devised by the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations agency. Other nations, including the United Kingdom and Germany, have announced similar plans.

In regulations published Tuesday, the State Department claims it has addressed privacy concerns. The chipped passports "will not permit 'tracking' of individuals," the department said. "It will only permit governmental authorities to know that an individual has arrived at a port of entry--which governmental authorities already know from presentation of non-electronic passports--with greater assurance that the person who presents the passport is the legitimate holder of the passport."

To address Americans' concerns about ID theft, the Bush administration said the new passports will be outfitted with "antiskimming material" in the front cover to "mitigate" the threat of the information being surreptitiously scanned from afar. It's not clear, though, how well the technique will work against high-powered readers that have been demonstrated to read RFID chips from about 160 feet away.

"The shielding in the passport is a physical device that basically, when the passport cover is closed, it's very difficult to read the chip," a State Department official, who did not wish to be identified by name, said Tuesday. The official was unable to provide details about the material's composition. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, which has been working to evaluate the chip's vulnerability to skimming, was unable to provide further information on Tuesday.

Privacy advocates told CNET News.com that the anti-skimming device was a decent start. But if the cover of the passport happens to be open, all bets are off, said Bill Scannell, a privacy advocate who founded the site RFIDkills.com. "They've built little baby radio stations into peoples' passports and covered it with concrete," he said, "but when the little hatch is open, you can still hear the music."

"It's better than nothing," Scannell went on, "but why take this risk?"

In addition, the passports will use "Basic Access Control," a reference to storing a pair of secret cryptographic keys in the chip inside. The concept is simple: The RFID chip disgorges its contents only after a reader successfully authenticates itself as being authorized to receive that information.

Computer scientists, however, have criticized that encryption method as flawed. In a recent paper (PDF here), RSA Laboratories' Ari Juels, and University of California's David Molnar and David Wagner, warned that the design of the encryption keys is insufficiently secure. They said that the use of a "single fixed key" for the lifetime of the e-passport creates a vulnerability.

The Bush administration could face an eventual legal challenge. A letter to the State Department from privacy groups (PDF here) says there is "no statutory authority" for the RFID passport because Congress has not authorized it.

"Our point is, whatever Congress may have meant in giving the State Department authority to issue passports was probably to issue passports that were like the old passports," said Lee Tien, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which co-authored the comments. "But at some point you are doing something that is significantly different, which should probably require some sort of additional congressional authorization. The argument is how broadly does that authority go, and honestly, it's something no one knows."

More from News.com on this story's topics

Processors

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Data security

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Privacy

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Federal government

Create an email alert | RSS feed

RFID

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
passport, RFID chip, RFID, Bush Administration, radio

56 comments (Page 1 of 4)
Once again..
by m.meister October 25, 2005 1:11 PM PDT
Once again, this administration shows an arrogance and, frankly, an ignorance to the concerns of privacy of the citizens of this nation. I don't see Congress being the saviors though. They are ready to crush our rights at the drop of a hat (can anyone say Patriot Act). Whenever someone challenges either of them, the two catch phrases come out to play: "terrorism" and "9/11". This administration's power is based on nothing but fear.
Reply to this comment View reply
Once again..
by m.meister October 25, 2005 1:11 PM PDT
Once again, this administration shows an arrogance and, frankly, an ignorance to the concerns of privacy of the citizens of this nation. I don't see Congress being the saviors though. They are ready to crush our rights at the drop of a hat (can anyone say Patriot Act). Whenever someone challenges either of them, the two catch phrases come out to play: "terrorism" and "9/11". This administration's power is based on nothing but fear.
Reply to this comment View reply
RFID not yet ready for primetime...
by dargon19888 October 25, 2005 1:48 PM PDT
Its one thing to use RFID in managing warehouse distribution, its another to try and manage it with individuals. Since any RFID reader can read the RFID chip, what's to stop someone like Wal-Mart from capturing the data as you enter the store or when you make the purchase. This way they can capture your id with your CC purchase. If that sounds paranoid, its not. Wal-Mart will place RFID scanners at their entrace/exits for theft prevention. All scanned tags' data will be captured... In reality though, all the RFID tag will do for the US government is to ensure that the passport being presented is one that has been issued by the US government, cracking down on forgeries. And even then, there will still be ways to cheat the system.
Reply to this comment View reply
RFID not yet ready for primetime...
by dargon19888 October 25, 2005 1:48 PM PDT
Its one thing to use RFID in managing warehouse distribution, its another to try and manage it with individuals. Since any RFID reader can read the RFID chip, what's to stop someone like Wal-Mart from capturing the data as you enter the store or when you make the purchase. This way they can capture your id with your CC purchase. If that sounds paranoid, its not. Wal-Mart will place RFID scanners at their entrace/exits for theft prevention. All scanned tags' data will be captured... In reality though, all the RFID tag will do for the US government is to ensure that the passport being presented is one that has been issued by the US government, cracking down on forgeries. And even then, there will still be ways to cheat the system.
Reply to this comment View reply
Glad I just got mine
by ballssalty October 25, 2005 2:28 PM PDT
I'm glad I just got my passport. It won't expire for ten years. But I have to agree, the arrogance is astounding. 98.5% of comments were negative and they go through with it anyway. What balls. I guess you could try and rip it out or damage it in someway that no reader can read it and just say it must be defective or something.
Reply to this comment View reply
Glad I just got mine
by ballssalty October 25, 2005 2:28 PM PDT
I'm glad I just got my passport. It won't expire for ten years. But I have to agree, the arrogance is astounding. 98.5% of comments were negative and they go through with it anyway. What balls. I guess you could try and rip it out or damage it in someway that no reader can read it and just say it must be defective or something.
Reply to this comment View reply
New Business Idea
by shadowself October 25, 2005 3:20 PM PDT
Anyone want to start a business of making copper foil lined passport holders? You could make an entire line of them from very high end with the outside make of expensive leather all the way down to plastic exterior with designs and/or logos on them. I know in 9 years when my current passport expires I'll either be buying one or making one of my own! I don't trust that just closing it and putting it into my pocket will keep it from being read. Inside a nice sleeve which is copper foil lined will be much more reasuring.
Reply to this comment
New Business Idea
by shadowself October 25, 2005 3:20 PM PDT
Anyone want to start a business of making copper foil lined passport holders? You could make an entire line of them from very high end with the outside make of expensive leather all the way down to plastic exterior with designs and/or logos on them. I know in 9 years when my current passport expires I'll either be buying one or making one of my own! I don't trust that just closing it and putting it into my pocket will keep it from being read. Inside a nice sleeve which is copper foil lined will be much more reasuring.
Reply to this comment
It won't solve the problem
by NotaBene October 25, 2005 3:39 PM PDT
Implanting RFID chips in passports is not going to make them more secure. Because they are RF they can be scanned at any time without the passport holders knowledge. And if it can be scanned it can be copied. And if it can be copied it's useless for the purpose of uniquely identifying anyone
Reply to this comment
It won't solve the problem
by NotaBene October 25, 2005 3:39 PM PDT
Implanting RFID chips in passports is not going to make them more secure. Because they are RF they can be scanned at any time without the passport holders knowledge. And if it can be scanned it can be copied. And if it can be copied it's useless for the purpose of uniquely identifying anyone
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
The dumbest generation? Not this crowd
YouTube ads for viral videos: 'buzz targeting'
GM keeps building cars on XP
GIS exec works to unlock hidden geo data
Hackers go after restaurants, markets
Most Popular Stories
Welcome to the social mess?
HP in talks to buy EDS
'Grand Theft Auto IV' nets Guinness record
HP to acquire EDS for $13.9 billion
Mac Office sales soar on Apple's gains
Resource center from News.com sponsors
Same great protection. Reengineered for speed.
Norton Internet Security™2008

Click Here!
Norton still delivers award-winning protection and now uses 83% less memory and scans 48% faster than the competitor average. Get a FREE trial today!

Click Here!
Norton Beats the Competition

See how Norton Internet Security™2008 uses less memory, while scanning and booting faster than the competitor average.

Norton Protection Blog

Read the latest from our security experts as they help protect people from evolving online threats.

Protect Your Bluetooth Connection

Don't let fraudsters sink their teeth into your Bluetooth connection.

Vishing - What you need to know

Meet the latest ID theft scam: Voice Phishing.

Take Norton for a Test Drive Today!

Act now to get your FREE trial of Norton Internet Security 2008.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.34%) -44.13 12,832.18
S&P 500 (-0.04%) -0.54 1,403.04
NASDAQ (0.27%) 6.63 2,495.12
CNET TECH (-0.06%) -0.99 1,744.82
  Symbol Lookup
Update your drivers with Version Tracker Pro
Learn more about Version Tracker Pro

advertisement
On TV.com: MILEY CYRUS photographs
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: