Police blotter: Laptop border searches OK'd

Related Stories
Police blotter: Mortgage 'spammers' sued by ISP
July 14, 2006
Police blotter: SBC sued over deleted screenplay
July 7, 2006
Police blotter: Student sues over IM-related suspension
June 30, 2006
Police blotter: Husband spies on wife's computer
June 16, 2006
Police blotter: eBay suit over $380,000 Porsche
May 26, 2006
Police blotter: 911 dispatcher misuses database, kills ex-girlfriend
May 19, 2006
Police blotter: Enhanced video used to convict arsonist
May 12, 2006
Police blotter: Wells Fargo not required to encrypt data
April 14, 2006
Police blotter: Porn-dialing firm loses appeal
March 31, 2006
Police blotter: Schools' IT chief loses bribery appeal
March 24, 2006
Police blotter: Judge orders Gmail disclosure
March 17, 2006
Judge to help feds against Google
March 14, 2006
Police blotter: Ex-employee faces suit over file deletion
March 10, 2006
Police blotter: Cell phone tracking rejected
March 3, 2006
Police blotter: Dot-com magnate loses fraud appeal
February 24, 2006
Judge: Firm not negligent in failure to encrypt data
February 14, 2006
Police blotter: Patriot Act e-mail spying approved
February 9, 2006
Verbatim: Search firms surveyed on privacy
February 3, 2006
Police blotter: Sysadmin loses e-intrusion case
January 13, 2006
Police blotter: Alleged eDonkey pirate gets trial
January 6, 2006
Police blotter: Nude 'profile' yields Yahoo suit
December 9, 2005
Police blotter: Legal flap over secret sex video
November 25, 2005
Police blotter: Judge questions Patriot Act bugs
November 4, 2005
Police blotter: Feds' cell phone tracking denied
October 28, 2005
"Police blotter" is a weekly CNET News.com report on the intersection of technology and the law.

What: A business traveler protests the warrantless search and seizure of his laptop by Homeland Security at the U.S.-Canada border.

When: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rules on July 24.

Outcome: Three-judge panel unanimously says that border police may conduct random searches of laptops without search warrants or probable cause. These searches can include seizing the laptop and subjecting it to extensive forensic analysis.

What happened, according to court documents:

In January 2004, Stuart Romm traveled to Las Vegas to attend a training seminar for his new employer. Then, on Feb. 1, Romm continued the business trip by boarding a flight to Kelowna, British Columbia.

Romm was denied entry by the Canadian authorities because of his criminal history. When he returned to the Seattle-Tacoma airport, he was interviewed by two agents of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement division.

They asked to search his laptop, and Romm agreed. Agent Camille Sugrue would later testify that she used the "EnCase" software to do a forensic analysis of Romm's hard drive.

That analysis and a subsequent one found some 42 child pornography images, which had been present in the cache used by Romm's Web browser and then deleted. But because in most operating systems, only the directory entry is removed when a file is "deleted," the forensic analysis was able to recover the actual files.

During the trial, Romm's attorney asked that the evidence from the border search be suppressed. The trial judge disagreed. Romm was eventually sentenced to two concurrent terms of 10 and 15 years for knowingly receiving and knowingly possessing child pornography.

The 9th Circuit refused to overturn his conviction, ruling that American citizens effectively enjoy no right to privacy when stopped at the border.

"We hold first that the ICE's forensic analysis of Romm's laptop was permissible without probable cause or a warrant under the border search doctrine," wrote Judge Carlos Bea. Joining him in the decision were Judges David Thompson and Betty Fletcher.

Bea cited the 1985 case of U.S. v. Montoya de Hernandez, in which a woman arriving in Los Angeles from Columbia was detained. Police believed she had swallowed balloons filled with cocaine, even though the court said they had no "clear indication" of it and did not have probable cause to search her.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court said police could rectally examine De Hernandez because it was a border crossing and, essentially, anything goes. (The rectal examination, by the way, did find 88 balloons filled with cocaine that had been smuggled in her alimentary canal.)

Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall dissented. They said the situation De Hernandez experienced had "the hallmark of a police state."

"To be sure, the court today invokes precedent stating that neither probable cause nor a warrant ever have been required for border searches," Brennan wrote. "If this is the law as a general matter, I believe it is time that we re-examine its foundations."

But Brennan and Marshall were outvoted by their fellow justices, who ruled that the drug war trumped privacy, citing a "veritable national crisis in law enforcement caused by smuggling of illicit narcotics." Today their decision means that laptop-toting travelers should expect no privacy either.

As an aside, a report last year from a U.S.-based marijuana activist says U.S. border guards looked through her digital camera snapshots and likely browsed through her laptop's contents. A London-based correspondent for The Economist magazine once reported similar firsthand experiences, and a 1998 article in The New York Times described how British customs scan laptops for sexual material. Here are some tips on using encryption to protect your privacy.

Excerpt from the court's opinion (Click here for PDF):

"First, we address whether the forensic analysis of Romm's laptop falls under the border search exception to the warrant requirement...Under the border search exception, the government may conduct routine searches of persons entering the United States without probable cause, reasonable suspicion, or a warrant. For Fourth Amendment purposes, an international airport terminal is the "functional equivalent" of a border. Thus, passengers deplaning from an international flight are subject to routine border searches.

Romm argues he was not subject to a warrantless border search because he never legally crossed the U.S.-Canada border. We have held the government must be reasonably certain that the object of a border search has crossed the border to conduct a valid border search....In all these cases, however, the issue was whether the person searched had physically crossed the border. There is no authority for the proposition that a person who fails to obtain legal entry at his destination may freely re-enter the United States; to the contrary, he or she may be searched just like any other person crossing the border.

Nor will we carve out an "official restraint" exception to the border search doctrine, as Romm advocates. We assume for the sake of argument that a person who, like Romm, is detained abroad has no opportunity to obtain foreign contraband. Even so, the border search doctrine is not limited to those cases where the searching officers have reason to suspect the entrant may be carrying foreign contraband. Instead, 'searches made at the border...are reasonable simply by virtue of the fact that they occur at the border.' Thus, the routine border search of Romm's laptop was reasonable, regardless whether Romm obtained foreign contraband in Canada or was under "official restraint."

In sum, we hold first that the ICE's forensic analysis of Romm's laptop was permissible without probable cause or a warrant under the border search doctrine."

More from News.com on this story's topics

Privacy

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Notebooks and tablets

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Defense/military

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Police Blotter, cause, laptop computer, border, police

29 comments (Page 1 of 2)
An outrageous and dangerous precedent
by baisa July 26, 2006 9:30 PM PDT
The notion that Americans have no right to privacy and no right to be free from search and seizure simply because they are crossing the border is OUTRAGEOUS. How can this repellant and extremely dangerous precedent be justified? The Constitution guarantees all Americans the right to be free from unwarranted searches and seizures. This principle should apply EVERYWHERE -- it is a fundamental individual right. As soon as it is accepted that being free from search and seizure is not a right in one context (entering the country) it will only be a matter of very short time before it starts spreading, virally, to all manner of other contexts, for all kinds of alleged important reasons.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
We The Sheeple....
by July 27, 2006 8:10 AM PDT
I love how everyone gets so outraged after it's too late. I was called "Chicken Little" when I tried to warn people 10-15 years ago. Enjoy your loss of rights, the sheeple mandated it!
Reply to this comment
Real Truth here people...CNUT bites
by lamer111 July 27, 2006 8:52 AM PDT
Tell the WHOLE truth CNET! Excerpt from Fark. THERE IS A HELL OF LOT MORE TO THIS STORY. I can't believe Cnet left the most crucial part of the story out, namely that Canada Customs examined his computer before refusing him entry into the Canada then alerted U.S. authorities on his return trip to the United States. When Canada Customs examined his computer they discovered several known child pornography web sites in his browser history and passed that information to American law enforcement. THAT is what prompted the authorities to check his computer. It wasn't just some agent acting on a whim.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
Diary/notebook border search
by George Moss July 27, 2006 10:55 AM PDT
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - El Progresso, Mexico/TX border crossing in vehicle - self and another US citizen - Extensive search of vehicle - Agent paged through my friend's diary/notebook and envelopes containing mail he had received - I asked "are you authorized to search personal notes?" - (bruque) "Yes." - 1-1/2 hour delay - nothing found.
Reply to this comment View reply
Can they copy data from your drive?
by July 27, 2006 1:52 PM PDT
Can they copy data from your drive, or image your hardrive, without your consent? (I probably wouldn't mind if they took a quick manual look at my laptop while I observed, but I would really dislike having my personal data copied for later scrutiny or distribution. That seems like theft to me.)
Reply to this comment
welcome to police state USA!
by chris_d July 28, 2006 12:07 PM PDT
I don't care about precedent, it's just plain wrong for customs to be able to search your entire laptop just because they want to, which the courts said is ok. It's getting bad. Read this story: http://www.nbc10.com/news/9574663/detail.html
Reply to this comment
Exactly why precedents are so dangerous
by baisa July 28, 2006 6:21 PM PDT
The previous poster pointed out situations where unwarranted searches and siezures have already been accepted. That this kind of mentality is probably quite prevalent, is PRECISELY why bad precedents are so dangerous! It is ok for airlines to request reasonable examinations of luggage and one's person prior to boarding an airplane, for safety and security reasons. One can refuse by not flying, and this is a private arrangement. But the border is another matter altogether. What is interesting, is that some of the main reasons for searching people at borders are the prohibition against drugs, which itself is a violation of individual rights. All these violations of rights just necessitate and justify further violations of rights.
Reply to this comment
What if your child was in those photos?
by rodolfo76 July 29, 2006 5:12 AM PDT
Were my child the one contained in those photos I would certainly feel glad they nabbed this fellow. We can't expect law enforcement to do their job if we take away their tools. They have a difficult enough job!
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
Border search
by angeles75 July 29, 2006 7:30 AM PDT
If it means a safer America. I am all for it.
Reply to this comment View reply
Rights?
by walwebster July 30, 2006 8:00 PM PDT
I don't recall anybody fighting (much less dying) for the "right" to cross borders without thorough scrutiny since Genghis Khan's last great barnstorming tour ...
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Early player leaves as Facebook goes corporate
Video: Monday QuickCast, 1st edition
RIM makes Bold Blackberry debut
HelioVolt claims CIGS solar-efficiency mark
Virtual worlds for preschoolers? They're here
Most Popular Stories
Google to launch Friend Connect for the social Web
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
RIM makes a Bold BlackBerry debut
A modest proposal to fix Dell's customer service
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.94%) -120.90 12,745.88
S&P 500 (-0.67%) -9.40 1,388.28
NASDAQ (-0.23%) -5.72 2,445.52
CNET TECH (-0.64%) -11.13 1,724.28
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On TechRepublic: 10 ways users mess up their computers
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: