• On MP3.com: Free music videos

January 29, 2008 4:00 AM PST

Red light for green-tech start-ups?

  • Print

(continued from previous page)

By contrast, venture capitalists in some biofuels enterprises have been thrust into the role of providing what amounts to project financing. That's normally the purview of companies like General Electric's financing division, but traditional sources may be reluctant to back a company with an unproven technology, say investors.

Biodiesel maker Imperium Renewables raised more than $200 million in venture capital and private equity, which helped the company to open a 100-million-gallon per year facility last year. Its expansion plans were scaled back, however, when it canceled an IPO earlier in January, citing market conditions.

As many of these biofuels facilities are just now getting off the ground, it's too early to say how well it will work out for venture capital investors who do finance plant construction.

Gorillas needed
The "funding gap" dynamic is also attracting a wider range of companies and financial instruments to clean tech and energy.

For example, US Renewables, which started its first fund in 2005, is in the business of financing and developing energy projects, rather than investing in technology development. It focuses on projects in biofuels, biomass, geothermal, landfill to methane, and solar power.

"In clean tech, M&A's make the most sense because they require the scale of the 800-pound gorillas--GE, Siemens, IBM. When the dust settles, there will be some consolidation."
--Claudia Fan Munce, managing director, IBM's Venture Capital Group

Private equity and other institutional investors like hedge funds are warming to clean tech as well. The Carlyle Group's energy buyout and investment structure has invested in a geothermal project. The Masdar Initiative, based in Abu Dhabi, spearheaded the creation of a $250 million fund in 2006 dedicated to clean tech.

To scale up, many smaller companies need to orchestrate financing that involves a few different sources, Jim Matheson, a clean-tech investor at Flagship Ventures, said at a recent panel on investing.

Government incentives, in particular, can play a significant role. States are keen to encourage development of the budding clean technology industry and attract construction of plants that can create so-called "green collar" jobs.

The state of New York is footing half the bill--or $14.8 million--to build ethanol start-up Mascoma's first demonstration plant. Tennessee is fronting $41 million for a switchgrass-to-ethanol facility. "Different regions are more aggressive than others," said Mascoma CEO Bruce Jamerson.

Although some hope that 2008 will be the year where green-tech start-ups go public to reward their investors, what's more likely is mergers and acquisitions, said Claudia Fan Munce, the managing director of IBM's Venture Capital Group and chairwoman of the National Venture Capital Association. She said there are no indications that the conditions for IPOs will improve this year.

"In clean tech, M&A's make the most sense because they require the scale of the 800-pound gorillas--GE, Siemens, IBM," she said. "When the dust settles, there will be some consolidation."

Public green-tech companies have felt the recent market volatility, even though the sector's long-term prospects are strong, given high demand and supportive government policies.

Previous page
Page 1 | 2

See more CNET content tagged:
CMGI @Ventures, natural gas, IPO, sector, start-up

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments
Are you saying the energy bubble has burst. We told you so.
by Manhattan2 January 29, 2008 6:08 AM PST
As soon as enough people realize the mistake that is Ethanol the same thing will happen with biofuels. Unless the governments of the world are going to continue to subsidize the current crop of green technologies most of these ventures will decay. We set out years ago to develop sensible ventures in energy, security, and exploration. Keep an eye on the privatley funded Manhattan2 Project for sustainable solutions. Solutions that make sense, can compete financially with coal and gas, and do not adversely effect the environment nearly as much as using gas, coal and oil do.
Reply to this comment
You are for the right things, but...
by sardonux January 29, 2008 7:56 AM PST
I agree with your messaging. Green is good, and unfortunately there are a lot of misguided steps happening in the growth and development of alternative energy sources.

The sad part is that your messaging is arrogant and poorly written; it detracts from the cause you are so passionate about. You and your cause (yes, I saw your website) should take a lesson from Dale Carnegie ("How to win friends and influence people," 1981) before continuing with your self-centered and likely ignored tirades.

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (6.54%) 494.13 8,046.42
S&P 500 (6.32%) 47.59 800.03
NASDAQ (5.18%) 68.23 1,384.35
CNET TECH (5.95%) 56.25 1,002.00
  Symbol Lookup

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right