- Related Stories
-
EU ruling deals setback to Microsoft
September 17, 2007 -
The Web, Ozzie make their mark at Microsoft
May 3, 2007 -
Start-up Zimbra takes Web e-mail offline
March 25, 2007 -
IBM gives Lotus a dose of Web 2.0
January 22, 2007 -
IBM targets Microsoft's suite spot
August 2, 2005 - Related Blogs
-
IBM takes on Microsoft Office again with Lotus Symphony
September 18, 2007 -
Google Presentations gets the green light
September 17, 2007
(continued from previous page)
While IBM, Sun Microsystems and Novell are attempting to offer OpenOffice-derived alternatives to Microsoft, Web businesses Google and now Yahoo are using Web 2.0-style features to attack Microsoft's largest businesses.
Yahoo's Zimbra e-mail and collaboration software is notable because it resembles a full-featured desktop application but the client runs in a browser. To do that, Zimbra has made heavy use of the Web programming technique called Ajax to make its application more interactive and support features such as "mashups," Web sites or applications that combine content from multiple sources but appear seamless upon use.
Zimbra has signed on 8 million customers through Internet service providers. The company designed its e-mail server for businesses as well, an area where Microsoft's Exchange is entrenched. But it's not clear whether Yahoo will continue to pursue that market, O'Grady said.
Several other start-ups are developing Web-based Office alternatives using Ajax or Adobe's Flash, which are typically free for consumers.
Google, meanwhile, continues to expand its Google Apps suite through new products, such as Google Presentations, and acquisitions including Web collaboration company JotSpot, which it bought last year.
The Web search king also has its eye on large businesses. It approached consulting firm Capgemini to create support and installation services for Google Apps Premium Edition, which costs $50 per user per year.
Capgemini executives said the product lacks the sophistication of Microsoft Office but can fill a role even inside large corporations, such as collaborating with business partners over the Internet.
Chris Swenson, a software analyst at NPD Group, said the most recent sales data on Office 2007 looks very good for Microsoft. In the retail channel, sales to date this year show Office having a 96 percent dollar share and 98 percent dollar share in the commercial market.
It's exactly that massive market share and the billions spent that explains IBM's introduction of Lotus Symphony and Web-based Office alternatives, said Gartner's Silver. He added that he has seen more "reasonable interest" in Office alternatives in the past year among Gartner's corporate clients.
Microsoft "makes billions of dollars (in desktop software) so it's a hard market to ignore," he said. "But it's a hard market to get into."
See more CNET content tagged:
Microsoft Office,
IBM Corp.,
desktop software,
small business,
spreadsheet
become stale. And don't forget Apple's iWork and especially
Numbers, a refreshing change to Excel.
A tragedy I guess where our govt. love to spend more of our money than saving and putting them to good use.
Unless our governing bodies embrace the open software we are still doom to paying for office.
Look at the University?... Our so-call learning institution... Are they using Office or Open Office? They are not learning compare to our overseas counterpart.
It is not the software availability.. it who is controlling the minds. The perception that MS Office is the best needs to be corrected. The inability of our teachers to learn and improve needs to be reassessed.
Yep. Also slow, buggy, and an all-around PITA to support.
Behind that pretty little ribbon is basically the same rehashed Office from 2003, with no compelling new stuff and a new GUI splashed on top of it.
As for Macs, NeoOffice is far easier to use and nowhere near as ugly on the resources. Oh, and it doesn't cost $400 US. ;)
/P
You are talking about power users. Most of use pay $200 at least for a simple type writer. I am not saying that the program is not useful.. It is but only to the only few. WHY DOES THE REST WHO DO NOT NEED ALL THOSE COLLABORATION NEED TO SUFFER?
My point is the Govt. is determining what we have to use. Unless the Govt. change and open itself to all document format there is no free choice. Open document format is already an international standard but Microsoft refuse to have it in their software instead they tried to sell their proprietary format as an international standard.
Point is I am not saying that their software is not good ... I am saying that all these other software have no chance of wide usage unless the GOVT, FEDS, ALL GOVERNING BODY are open to it.
These open source software are now widely used overseas. In fact some government already make them a standard. Billions of dollars safe in licensing fees could be better use.
I my consultation business I have save businesses with 30 or more users in licensing fees by limiting Office installation. I identify the power users and basically using a survey find out whether MS Office or OpenOffice need to be installed in each computer. Majority of the company could just work with OpenOffice.
I have seen enough waste in the Government from the city to the FEDS especially in the field of IT.
And we have had MS Office users linking to OpenOffice.org documents, and vice versa, for years.
The only limitation we've faced is the lack of support for ODF from Microsoft.
together and created a better, faster, more flexible,
programatically addressable, open, and intuitive interface to
allow pivoting/manipulation of backend data from within the
spreadsheet program... Well, all of a sudden the Excel power
users would insist on using it."[/i]
I suspect that this is part of what IBM may be up to... ;)
/P
That is what Google or IBM should do. Create an excel an access like aplication where you dont have to use commands but clicks. That is the hardest thing about access and excel, they ask you to introduce commands. We, users, just need the cliks. That is like the calculators, you dont put formula, you just press bottons.
When we go to college, we know how hard Access and Excel may be. Google, please create a clik by clik version of something like Access or Excel.
Anything is better than Word.
PowerPoint is almost a parody of itself.
Excel has some very useful features that are powerful if you want to bother buying and reading a manual.
At one point, MSFT announced Excel would be enterprise-class with a potential of 3 million records. A quant, sold-out SPSS user, told me MSFT pulled back on that.
An outfit that can make pivot-tables an intuitive push-button affair and give users massive database size capacity would have a shot at the power users but for the workaday PC users, Excel is actually useful. Amazing that MSFT developed it.
Outlook Web Access and Exchange doesn't??"[/i]
* Unlike Outlook, they're not great big raging security risks.
* They don't require a monstrosity of a computer just to operate
as a desktop (e.g. Vista's requirements) or on the server (see
also the bloatastic mess that is Exchange).
* They don't require CALs and other unnecessary costs.
* Unlike OWA, their web pages actually work well with a typical
user's workflow, and are designed to be useful and productive.
* Unlike OWA, they don't require a monstrous and bloated
security hole (see also "IIS") as a webserver.
Shall I continue?
/P
I think the sharks are circling.
Plus MS-Works and MS-Office is bundled with just about every PC sold, so it is practically free anyway.
I am downloading Lotus Symphony for Windows and Linux, but even though I have high speed broadband it is very slow. The download manager IBM uses crashed my web browser and I tried Firefox 2.0.0.7 and IE 7.0 but I was forced to do the HTTP download. No option for BitTorrent downloads either. IBM has such poor quality control these days that even their web technology is messed up. Since it is based on Lotus Notes and Lotus Domino, you know that IBM messed them up after buying out Lotus. IBM tech support is horrible as well.
Lotus Symphony may be a dog for IBM, I think they should just make some of the Lotus source code and file formats available to improve OpenOffice.Org and not even bother with Lotus Symphony.
In one of your letters you made mention of the @IRR and @ERR functions in the 1-2-3 product. By design the @IRR (notably "absent" in Open Office) will calculate the Internal Rate of Return; where the @ERR is used in conjunction with other formulas, posted was an "ERR" showing an error was received in the calculations. As far as I can see in the program I cannot find an @ERR function that will allow us to calculate an Economic Rate of Return" Waiting around for years can be a very heavy load to carry especially when yet another holoday season is around the corner and the housing market is in such turmoil. This move by IBM should have made 10 years ago (with Lotus Symphony running on OS/2 also). Where was "OpenOffice.Org" at that time!
First: One ISO Right Cross To The Head.
Second: One EU Court of First Instance Left Upper-Cut To The Jaw.
and
Third: One IBM Jab To The Mid-Section
One awaits to see how much of Redmond's blood has really been spilled before Redmond goes to the next "Round" with the ISO! Are there any bets!
Now, the talk of United States "Referees" from:
"EC's Kroes slams DOJ reaction to Microsoft ruling"
"The DOJ statement added: "In the United States, antitrust laws are enforced to protect consumers by protecting competition, not competitors". Barring "demonstrable consumer harm, all companies, including dominant firms, are encouraged to compete vigorously."
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/091907-ec-microsoft-antitrust-ruling.html?netht=091907dailynews2&&nladname=091907dailynews
Stay tuned folks as these rounds of battles for its life of the Redmond Giant is not going to be over until the fat lady sings. Commander_Spock and Crew just can't wait to see the counter-punches from the Redmond Giant.
As for IBM and OpenOffice, read the news release and see what IBM is doing and contributing. They are donating, money, programmers and some of the code they developed for Symphony that was not in OpenOffice. The consensus seems to be that OpenOffice will get better even faster. If there is a downside, it may be to OxygenFree Office that is the offshoot of OpenOffice modded to be more business focused than the generic OpenOffice.
I do not thing it is OpenOffice vs Symphony vs Google vs StarOffice (Sun's version) but all of them are more common than different and collaborating to reach somewhat different markets. If all of the 128,000,000 Notes users upgrade to Notes 8 and phased out or required odf formats it will hurt MS.
I now do not accept MS format from my clients in the office. I started this some time ago and back then required and accepted only rtf and 1-2-3 file formats. When I switched to odf, I found little resistance with my clients. Some updated by simply downloading OpenOffice and use it for a file converter but more and more are electing to use it. I client has converted all of its office to it, in excess of 80 persons. It turned out more than 2/3rds had it at home either on their person computers or their kids so they were used to it.
1. "Installing IBM Lotus Symphony on Windows XP and Windows Vista"
2. "Installing IBM Lotus Symphony on Linux SLED 10 and RHEL5"
http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/installGuide.jspa
Good Luck.
- Watch Out Cisco, HP, Dell etc. Geekware is here
-
by b.k.m
September 20, 2007 10:21 AM PDT
- Yeah... and companies are going to stop buying Cisco network equipment because Netgear is so much cheaper. Watch out Cisco. HP better plan an exit for it's printer business because large corporations everywhere are going digital! The end is near for HP's cash cow. Dell better rethink its strategy too because corporations are going to realize what consumers have known for a long time - generic clones like eMachines are cheaper. In fact, now everybody is listening to the nerdy IT guy who runs Linux on his homebuilt -- because all along he's had all the strategies to save tons of money.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 51 Comments >>