- Related Stories
-
Sun tries again with consumer-flavored Java
May 7, 2007 -
Engineering change: Plugging Africa's kids in to $100 laptop
April 11, 2007 -
Sun picks GPL license for Java code
November 12, 2006 -
'Write once, run anywhere' not working for phones
July 14, 2005 - Related Blogs
-
Sun to acquire Java cell phone tech
April 12, 2007
The server and software company hopes to sell a version of Java to phone companies that will bring network access to the world's computers, executives said here at the
"Java will play a central role in bringing the Internet to the planet," Chief Executive Jonathan Schwartz said during a news conference. "It will be the software to build the devices to bridge the digital divide." In a brief speech at the show, Schwartz indicated he believed the Java-powered mobile phones could be sold for $30 to $50 apiece.
That's a notch cheaper than the
Sun isn't building its own phone, Schwartz said. Instead, the company expects partnerships with manufacturers that will have the direct relationships with customers. "We're not there to disintermediate them from their audience," Schwartz said.
Key to the vision is JavaFX Mobile, based largely on technology Sun acquired when it
JavaFX Mobile is geared for small devices, but its Java interface is most similar to the Java Standard Edition (SE) software that runs on standard PCs, said James Gosling, often called the father of Java. However, the software also can run the host of Java applications that have been written for the prevailing incarnation of Java for mobile phones, called Mobile Internet Device Platform (MIDP). MIDP is based on the more compact Java Micro Edition (ME).
JavaFX Mobile will usher in a new, more direct phase of Sun's years-long attempt to profit from the millions of dollars it has invested in Java software since its public debut in 1995. Sun has arguably benefited indirectly from Java--for example, by holding Microsoft at bay in some domains, by keeping programmers interested in Sun, and by gaining an entree at customers that need to buy servers--but it's been companies such as IBM, Oracle and BEA Systems that have made the most money selling companies Java products to run software on servers.
Today, Sun licenses Java to mobile phone companies such as Motorola or Nokia, which get access to working "reference implementation" software and typically assemble their own collections of Java components.
But Sun expects to directly charge for JavaFX Mobile. It's realistic to expect phone makers to begin using it in the first half of 2008, said Rich Green, Sun's executive vice president of software.
Sun will ship phone manufacturers a pre-built "binary" that sidesteps some of the issues of compatibility that have dogged Java in mobile phones. Sun long has billed Java's advantage as "write once, run anywhere," but because phone makers enabled different modules of Java, software written for one phone might not run on another.
"JavaFX is a binary product. You can't have fragmentation if it's a binary implementation," Green said. "That business model saves time and energy on the part of licensees who don't have to spend time mucking with source code."
Sun showed JavaFX Mobile applications, including Yahoo Go for Mobile 2.0 Internet services, running on a mobile phone. The phone, a model from
Sun has been trying to bring today's unconnected billions onto the Internet for years, in part because it hopes to sell back-end equipment to the banks, governments and others who will provide Internet-based services.
To further this effort, Schwartz described an initiative he termed "engineers without borders" to try to marshal the energy of technologists to improve the lot of humanity.
"There's a lot of passion about people trying to bring technology to the developing world," Schwartz said.
See more CNET content tagged:
Sun Microsystems Inc.,
OLPC,
Java,
Jonathan Schwartz,
Java software
ps NEVER GIVE IN
Also why would you call yourselves SUN.
Oh yes mobiles are better.
It just a shame noone knows hoow to make a decent global communicator version.
anyway year shift this story along due to me seeming to be beccomming of and imfamous blogger.
more like board so i type.
themselves in the head. It would be equally productive.
We wanted a lightweight but powerful Internet language for websites to deploy quickly so hopefully JavaFX will do that and fulfill the original promise of Java.
basically Flash overtook Java in the late 90s and now hopefully Java will be allot more popular here.
JavaFX seems to me just another repeat of the saga that played out in the late 90s that eventually lead to the Java Plug-in for IE and other browsers. At first, each browser had its own implementation of the Sun JVM, which lead to the same problems mentioned in the article. For all the hype, this seems like a natural evolutionary step that was bound to happen. However, I disagree with Sun's attempt to license this however. Maybe they're having regrets over not monetizing Java Plugin after the suit with Microsoft. I think keeping the JVM license free was key to it's survival.
Please read more at:
http://www.omninews.com