December 22, 2007 5:19 AM PST
The afterlife is expensive for digital movies
- Related Stories
-
Dolby stakes its claim in 3D movie tech
October 8, 2007 -
THX hears the call of consumer electronics
July 20, 2007 -
3D cinema tech taking on a starring role
May 16, 2007 -
Inside the Lucasfilm data center
January 26, 2007 -
Visual-effects masters put the magic in ILM
January 25, 2007 -
At Sundance, even artwork needs a power cord
January 20, 2007 -
Disney design exec touts good ol' pen and paper
August 1, 2006 -
Pixar goes to Hollywood
January 25, 2006 -
Hollywood whistles a high-tech 'toon
October 29, 2004
Industry report says movie studios must address digital archiving problems now or risk losing movie archives forever.
The New York Times
The story "The afterlife is expensive for digital movies" published December 22, 2007 at 5:19 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.

Regardless of how much data is generated, $200.000. would
buy a lot of RAIDs... in different cities for safety.
You could keep the drives running, and as new storage
technology come along, just copy it over.
Still the over $200,000 figure seems way out of line.
Be that as it may, one of the problems with digital media is that it has a rapid (<10 years) life cycle.
It doesn't matter what kind of content (old Word documents are gone forever,) the audio and video wolds are evolving over the years as formats change.
Nobody is thinking of maintaining file compatibility.