The iPod is growing up

news analysis If Apple really is putting a version of Mac OS X in a new iPod, presumably it has more in mind than showing high-quality reruns of The Hills.

Any talk these days of Apple and the future of mobile computing quickly turns to the iPhone. The company is on its way to selling a million iPhones in the first three months of what Apple says is a multiyear strategy to enter the mobile phone market.

But Apple makes another mobile device. It's called the iPod. And if the persistent rumors are fulfilled Wednesday during the latest episode of The Steve Jobs Show (a product presentation at San Francisco's Moscone Center), the iPod is about to get a whole lot more powerful.

special coverage
Complete event coverage
Apple announces a revised lineup of iPods, a new version of iTunes and a Wi-Fi Music Store.

A wide-screen iPod that looks an awful lot like an iPhone seems like the most likely bet for the sixth generation of Apple's ubiquitous music and video player line. It also seems very likely that those new iPods will run the same stripped-down version of Mac OS X found on the iPhone, something even Jobs himself hinted at during a meeting with Apple employees on the eve of the iPhone launch.

You don't need a sophisticated operating system to play songs and TV shows, so at that point, the iPod stops being just a gadget. So, then, what exactly is it? Like the iPhone, it becomes something in between a gadget and a PC, which has been treacherous ground for the PC industry.

The tech industry appears to be at another one of those pesky crossroads. The PC is, well, dated. We all need one, and we all use one, but we just don't get excited about buying a new one anymore.

As a result, the PC industry has been scrambling to find the next big thing. Tablet PCs? Nope. Home media centers? Maybe, but not yet. Digital televisions? Still the domain of the consumer electronics industry.

An iPod with a more powerful operating system and a touch screen could suddenly become an intriguing little device for those who like the iPhone, but don't want to spend 600 bucks or hook up with AT&T.

Apple found its next big thing six years ago when it released the iPod. It wasn't the first company to figure out that people wanted to carry all those Napsterized songs in their pocket, but it has certainly made the most of it. More than 70 percent of people in the U.S. who want a portable digital music player buy an iPod.

But the iPod really does just one thing. It does it well--and yes, you can also store contacts, appointments and play games that would have looked lame 10 years ago--but nobody buys an iPod to make sure they remember that doctor's appointment.

After Wednesday, that might be different. An iPod with a more powerful operating system and a touch screen could suddenly become an intriguing little device for those who like the iPhone, but don't want to spend 600 bucks or hook up with AT&T.

It wouldn't be hard to imagine some of those people put off by the iPhone's price and wireless carrier would shell out $349--the current price for the 80GB iPod--for an iPod that can do far more than just play videos or music.

That is, assuming Apple doesn't overlook what's really needed in a mobile computer. There's no point in putting a sophisticated operating system in an iPod if you wall that device off from the Internet. Apple has resisted adding Wi-Fi to the iPod thus far, but it broke that barrier with the iPhone and perhaps it has figured out a way to add Wi-Fi without killing battery life.

And it would really need to be a phone-less iPhone, with applications like Safari, YouTube and Google Maps. Ideally, it needs third-party applications, such as games or GPS navigation. But it might take Apple awhile to admit that, given that its approach to application development on the iPhone was to limit developers to Web-based applications.

The entire combination could make the $349 iPod more attractive. Apple's revenue growth from iPods has stalled, even though the unit growth is still above 20 percent year over year. That implies that iPod buyers are opting for the less expensive $199 4GB Nano or the $249 30GB iPod.

It would also finally give Apple the real wide-screen video player that iPod fans have been clamoring for since just before last year's "showtime" event. And, after all, that's still the iPod's sweet spot: mobile entertainment.

It's quite possible that Apple doesn't want to make that dramatic a leap just yet. Jobs prizes simplicity and aesthetics, and a large part of the iPod's appeal has been that it does one thing (or a couple), and does it (or them) well.

But a Mac OS X-based iPod could be a compelling device as the industry and its customers try to figure out how mobile computers should evolve. It would avoid the early mistakes of the UMPC, which runs a battery-sapping PC operating system, doesn't fit in a pocket, and at around $1,000, has been met with lukewarm--at best--interest from consumers.

There are other devices out there, like Sony's PSP and video players from Archos, that are trying to do the same thing. But with sales of more than 10 million iPods a quarter--and a whopping 21 million last holiday season--Apple has established the iPod as one of the most widely used handheld gadgets on the planet.

What if it were a computer, too?

More from News.com on this story's topics

Mac OS

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Smartphones

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Music devices

Create an email alert | RSS feed

iPhone

RSS feed

Apple

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Apple iPhone, Apple iPod, video player, Apple Computer, touch screen

41 comments (Page 1 of 2)
geeks vs cool
by ChartGEEK September 4, 2007 4:35 AM PDT
all in one mobile warrior = HTC Advantage 7501 with phone, 5" screen, Windows Mobile 6, GPS, etc, etc. Or UMPC (Ultra Mobile PC) is their HTC Shift with Vista... Yea, both bigger than iphone/pod but I can ADD anything I want to either without cracking the code.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
The next ipod will be VERY COOL!
by inachu September 4, 2007 5:31 AM PDT
Touch screen with a virtual wheel. Just as long as it can play pacman like the other video ipods can then I'm all smiles!
Reply to this comment View reply
It's a PDA
by menotbug September 4, 2007 5:35 AM PDT
I don't know how you can write an entire article struggling to define this new class of mini-PC without even mentioning the word PDA, which, in fact is the correct answer. The new ipod, if the rumors are true, will be a mobile device that runs a scaled-down version of a big name OS. Hello? It's a PDA, an established piece of technology. No need to think up a more creative term for it.
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
Bingo!
by DaiMac September 4, 2007 6:32 AM PDT
You hit the nail right on the head- Apple is trying to prevent stuffing the iPod full of features that only 5% of its users will actually use. People seem to forget (until the time comes around to list "greatest tech flops" or somesuch) that Apple already made this mistake with the Newton and learned from it. Everybody wants to ascribe the iPod's success to marketing and such, but the truth is people wanted simple and powerful and Apple gave it to them. If you want ungodly complex and stuffed to the brim with near-useless features, there are other companies for that, as ChartGeek demonstrated so aptly.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
RE: PDA
by drumby04 September 4, 2007 6:52 AM PDT
I would put a large chunk of change that Apple will never produce something that could be classified as a "PDA" (again, if you call the Newton that). Considering they've already surpassed that label with the iPhone, they have no reason to straddle it with another product. Any software that they implement for use on the iPod (or any device for that matter), including iterations of OS X, won't resemble anything you've seen on what has been called a "PDA," nor will it strive to meet the functions necessary to be classified as such. I think anyone that believes they can accurately predict what Apple will do next is crazy. Why those who obviously don't understand how Apple works would consider this is beyond me.
Reply to this comment
Personally, I'd like a PDF reader
by frankz00 September 4, 2007 8:39 AM PDT
All of the eBook readers except Sony's have **** poor support for PDF. Throw a PDF reader on this baby, we have a game changer!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Son of a Newton
by RobertFHarwood September 4, 2007 8:52 AM PDT
I was an early adopter of the Newton. I still have a Newton to manage my diabetes, the DietLog app for the Newton is the best I have ever seen, including the PalmPilot version. If they put the same handwriting recognition on it that would also be a good thing. It seems like Steve Jobs is comming around to John Sculley's point of view. If he hadn't killed off the Newton Company he would have quite a team of experienced developers for it. The Newton's gone, long live the iPod.
Reply to this comment
my guess
by ldhoover1 September 4, 2007 8:58 AM PDT
I think Apple will add Bluetooth to the iPod (pad) and then you can use the expanded screen as input for any mobile phone that supports wireless web any new motorola and Nokia will act as a wireless modem already and Bluetooth doesnt use up much battery so usable life isn't compromised on the iPod Just my guess tho
Reply to this comment
Hey c|net....
by Heebee Jeebies September 4, 2007 9:11 AM PDT
While I am all for an iPod from the iPhone minus the phone and AT&T, how about if you stop all the rumor and gossip junk. Basically you keep saying the same thing over and over but with a different heading. How many times do you plan to gossip about something that hasn't been announced, may not be and has already been gossiped about by you before. Come on how about some real news! Robert
Reply to this comment
Grammar (sorry, it just bugs me)
by eccesignum September 4, 2007 9:14 AM PDT
While I found the story to be interesting, the last sentence just bugged me. It really should be, "What if it *were* a computer, too?" "In FORMAL writing, use WERE rather than WAS to express a state of affairs that is contrary to the facts: I wish it WERE finished (but it is not); Suppose it WERE true (but it is false); He behaves as though he WERE a millionaire (but he is not). Similarly for hypotetical conditions after if: If John WERE here, he would know; If it WERE to rain we should get wet; He spoke as if I WERE deaf. In all of the above, WAS is common in less formal styles. But even when you're not attempting formality, WERE is the only choice in inverted sentences: WERE this true, it would be very alarming." Source:Longman Guide to English Language (Sidney Greenbaum, Jane Whitcut) Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled arguing. :)
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Mac Office sales soar on Apple's gains
Friend Connect warms up Google Campfire One
Microsoft launches space tours on the Web
Ellison: On-demand software growing slowly
Study: Wealthy nations ignore climate change
Most Popular Stories
RIM makes a Bold BlackBerry debut
Google to launch Friend Connect for the social Web
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
Google brings Friend Connect to the masses
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Apple (2.57%) 4.71 188.16
Dow Jones Industrials (1.02%) 130.43 12,876.31
S&P 500 (1.10%) 15.30 1,403.58
NASDAQ (1.76%) 42.97 2,488.49
CNET TECH (1.25%) 21.53 1,745.81
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
Click Here
On TechRepublic: Top 5 operating systems you never used
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: