U.N. proposes changes to Net's operation

ATHENS, Greece--A top United Nations official on Monday called for changes in the way the Internet is operated, taking aim at "self-serving justifications" for permitting the United States to preserve its unique influence and authority online.

Speaking during opening ceremonies at a four-day U.N. summit here, Yoshio Utsumi criticized the current rules for overseeing domain names and Internet addresses, stressing that poorer nations are dissatisfied and are hoping that this week's meeting will erode U.S. influence.

"Many of them are tired of hearing 'You just don't understand,'" said Utsumi, a lawyer and former government official who is the secretary-general of the International Telecommunication Union, a U.N. agency. "Many do understand."

He added: "No matter what technical experts argue is the best system, no matter what self-serving justifications are made that this is the only possible way to do things, there are no systems or technologies that can eternally claim they are the best."

Human rights groups, however, have warned that many of the nations most critical of the current arrangement--Tunisia, Cuba, Iran, China--rank among the world's most repressive. The worry: If those governments have their way, the current, virtually limitless amount of free expression on the Internet may come to an end.

The Paris-based advocacy group Reporters Without Borders last week called those reform proposals alarming and asked: "Do we really want the countries that censor the Internet and jail cyberdissidents to be in charge of the online flow of information?" (The group also noted that the United Nations Commission on Human Rights counted, as members, nations such as Libya and Sudan, no champions of human rights themselves.)

Similarly, Amnesty International has sent a delegation here to the Internet Governance Forum to emphasize the need for protecting free speech. "The Internet Governance Forum needs to know that the online community is bothered about free expression online and willing to stand up for it," said Steve Ballinger, part of Amnesty's delegation.

Since 1998, domain names and Internet addresses have been overseen by the California-based Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, under an agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce. The U.S. government has occasionally used that unique relationship to its advantage, for instance when the Bush administration objected to a .xxx adult domain--an objection that ended with ICANN abruptly reversing itself and rejecting the domain suffix.

Recent changes (click here for PDF) to the Commerce Department-ICANN relationship haven't been enough to quiet anti-U.S. rumblings at the Athens summit.

The prime minister of Greece, Konstantínos Karamanlís, took a swipe at the U.S. during his opening speech, saying attendees should work to "enhance democracy in the Internet itself." Nitin Desai, an adviser for U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, called this week's event a "harbinger of a new type of multilateralism."

The only speaker on Monday who dwelled on free expression for more than a moment was Viviane Reding, the European Commission's Commissioner for Information Society and Media.

"Freedom, ladies and gentlemen, is sometimes seen as a threat to those who do not value human rights or want to impose their vision of the world or their religious belief" on others, Reding said. She urged the attendees to preserve the Internet as an "open and censorship-free zone."

The official purpose of the Internet Governance Forum, which was created at a similar U.N. event last year in Tunisia and is scheduled to convene annually for five years, is to discuss everything from domain names to spam and security. But many critics of the United States hope that the forum will contain the seeds to an organization to supplant ICANN, perhaps organized under the auspices of the United Nations.

Even though the U.S. has the most sophisticated Internet infrastructure, last year's meeting was held in Tunisia and this year's in Greece. Not one meeting is scheduled to be held in North America, though Brazil, India, and Egypt have announced their plans to host future ones. In addition, no U.S. government representative spoke during opening ceremonies.

More from News.com on this story's topics

International governments

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Domain names

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Internet

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
U.N., justification, Greece, expression, influence

111 comments (Page 1 of 4)
Let them go
by BattleAce7101 October 30, 2006 6:15 AM PST
Le the UN start their own internet. We really do not need them. It will remain US controlled. There is no problem there. I do no want future censoring by the UN. I do not even think the UN should exists.
Reply to this comment View reply
not suprised
by gsman11 October 30, 2006 7:31 AM PST
A UN controlled internet would be the worst decision the United States could possibly make. It should not even be on the drawing board. The UN exists today as a source of power for politically oppressive, weak, and/or economically insignificant countries to push their agendas on others, most often the US or some other "western" nation. The whole notion is ridiculous, why try to fix what isn?t broken? This is a typical attempt to weaken US influence when all that would be accomplished would be a weakening of the internet both in terms of openness/freedom as well as actual infrastructure.
Reply to this comment View reply
Life is rarely fair!
by truemtn October 30, 2006 7:39 AM PST
Oh Boo Hoo - In the course of each and every day I find hurdles in my way on my path to completing my tasks. I overcome them. I don't expect that I can whine and stomp my feet and expect to get any satisfaction. The people who control the internet, are the ones who built it - go build your own!
Reply to this comment
Aghast
by mycroft69 October 30, 2006 7:41 AM PST
I am absolutely exasperated by these responses to the article. Don't people realize that U.S. ownership and management of the Internet leads to global warming???
Reply to this comment View reply
UN & the Internet - Now that's scary!
by grumpyz October 30, 2006 7:56 AM PST
Not only should the UN build its own Internet (seeing how they don't like the one that is out there) they should also have their own country where they can conduct their own social experiments. If it wasn't so close to Halloween I'd swear this was an April Fool's joke.
Reply to this comment
Just pull the plug
by Im-Not-TED October 30, 2006 7:57 AM PST
If you do not like the rules to my game, stop playing. If other countries do not want to join Internet version 1.x, I will not miss them. Most of what I do on the freakin' thing is US based anyhow. The Internet is optional in life, though I am sure many people think it is not.
Reply to this comment View reply
U.N. Crying Again?
by TheZooker October 30, 2006 8:01 AM PST
The U.N. should design and construct their own. They could call it the "UNternet" and restrict it to use by only the members of their "club"!
Reply to this comment View reply
a five year old in a sandbox fighting for the red truck
by jabbotts October 30, 2006 8:03 AM PST
That seems to sum up this situation most exactly. Countries are asking that an (now grown too) international resource potentially as catalitic as the industrial revolution be managed by an international body. Your network administrator sits at the same level with upper management; why should the internet administrator not sit at the same level as the other international standards bodies? So far I've heard nothing but emotional arguments for why this is such a bad thing. If it can be managed by an international body who can keep the open standards from being invluenced or abused by more opressive country members of the UN then what's the issue? Oh right, I remember, why better human existance on this lonely little rock if your not getting significant personal gain in return.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
Boohoo U.N!
by SeizeCTRL October 30, 2006 8:12 AM PST
Considering how the US invented the internet, I see no harm in the way things are handled now. The U.N. should be more concerned with the genocide in Sudan, the nuclear ambitions of North Korea and Iran. Who does what with DNS should not be a U.N. problem for them to worry about.
Reply to this comment
Representitive
by perfectblue97 October 30, 2006 8:30 AM PST
Given that in a few years white western English speakers will only be a minority group on the web, shouldn't the running of the internet be given over to a group that will actually be representitive of those using it?
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Early player leaves as Facebook goes corporate
Video: Monday QuickCast, 1st edition
RIM unveils BlackBerry Bold/BlackBerry 9000
HelioVolt claims CIGS solar-efficiency mark
Virtual worlds for preschoolers? They're here
Most Popular Stories
Google to launch Friend Connect for the social Web
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
RIM BlackBerry Bold/BlackBerry 9000 makes official debut
A modest proposal to fix Dell's customer service
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.94%) -120.90 12,745.88
S&P 500 (-0.67%) -9.40 1,388.28
NASDAQ (-0.23%) -5.72 2,445.52
CNET TECH (-0.64%) -11.13 1,724.28
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On TV.com: ONE TREE HILL season 5
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: