- Related Stories
-
Icahn's showdown with Motorola reaches final hour
May 7, 2007 -
Another salvo in Icahn's bid for Motorola board seat
May 1, 2007 -
Razr-thin margins in Motorola strategic divide
February 5, 2007
Motorola issued a press release Monday evening after its annual shareholders meeting held in Chicago stating that early results indicated stockholders had re-elected Motorola's current board of directors and that Icahn, who now owns almost 3 percent of the company, was not elected to the board.
The fight had intensified over the past couple of weeks as Icahn and Motorola sent out dueling letters, press releases and advertisements to try to persuade shareholders to take their side.
Icahn, who initiated the battle in January after Motorola reported disappointing earnings, said he believes the company is being mismanaged. Specifically, he has attacked Chief Executive Ed Zander, questioning his performance and compensation, which totaled $10 million in 2006. He also criticized the current board of directors for not being accountable to shareholders, who have seen their shares in the company lose roughly $20 billion in value.
While Wall Street reacted negatively to the news that Icahn would not be on the Motorola board, sending the stock down slightly on Tuesday, some analysts say that Icahn's absence will likely have little long-term impact on a company that is struggling to keep up in an increasingly competitive market.
"I don't think the Icahn thing is that big a deal one way or another in terms of his ultimate influence," said Scott Swanson, senior analyst at Crowell Weedon & Co. "The principal issue for the company in the near term is getting new innovative products into the market that people are willing to pay a lot of money to buy."
A 3G issue?
Indeed, Motorola, the second-largest handset maker in the world, behind Nokia, is struggling to regain its footing in an increasingly competitive market. For the first quarter of 2007, the company reported a net loss as it resisted matching its competitors' price cuts.
But Zander has promised that the handset division will show a profit for the year. The company's biggest challenge moving forward is finding new products to excite the market that will help it compete against rivals Nokia and Samsung Electronics, which have made gains in recent quarters.
Motorola had seen big success with its popular ultra-thin Razr, introduced in 2004. That product helped Motorola increase its market share from 15 percent to 23 percent by the end of 2006.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
Corporate culture
Cell phones
Motorola
See more CNET content tagged:
Motorola Inc.,
Carl Icahn,
Ed Zander,
shareholder,
Nokia Corp.
- RAZR software stinks.
- I bought a RAZR used when my Sony Ericson died. It's a good phone but I'm really dissappointed with the interface. It's just clunky and less functional compared to my SONY. Can't sync via bluetooth. Sony's software is just slicker. Also it seems like the hardware has more power. The RAZR does have good predictive text though.
- Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
- just like
- "Meanwhile, Motorola will also soon face competition from a company with no cell phone expertise. Apple is expected to release its new iPhone in early June. That phone, which will be available only through AT&T's Cingular Wireless, is already attracting a great deal of attention." NO CELL PHONE EXPERIENCE, just like the iPod-no mp3 player experiencee. sometimes no experience is a good thing!
- Reply to this comment
- Software tightly coupled with Hardware
- Seems like Motorola should begin developing applications/server side services that work great on their phones. This is their problem. Sure hardware form factor has been the big seller for the last few years and what they did with the razor was similar to what Apple was able to achieve with the ipod, but they didn't build itunes, and an ongoing franchise in anything other than all the spin-offs of the razor. I am not saying they need a music hub (too late), but something equivalent. Every US carrier needs to differentiate, and Motorola could help them, but there doesn't seem to be much effort on Motorola's part, or maybe it is the carriers? This may be outside their core competency, but to survive they will need more than hardware.
- Reply to this comment


