Why old technologies are still kicking

In 1991, Stewart Alsop, the editor of InfoWorld and a thoughtful observer of industry trends, predicted that the last mainframe computer would be unplugged by 1996.

Last month, IBM introduced the latest version of its mainframe, the aged yet remarkably resilient warhorse of computing.

Today, mainframe sales are a tiny fraction of the personal computer market. But with the mainframe facing extinction, IBM retooled the technology, cut prices and revamped its strategy. A result is that mainframe technology--hardware, software and services--remains a large and lucrative business for IBM, and mainframes are still the back-office engines behind the world's financial markets and much of global commerce.

The mainframe stands as a telling case in the larger story of survivor technologies and markets. The demise of the old technology is confidently predicted, and indeed it may lose ground to the insurgent, as mainframes did to the personal computer. But the old technology or business often finds a sustainable, profitable life. Television, for example, was supposed to kill radio, and movies, for that matter. Cars, trucks and planes spelled the death of railways. A current death-knell forecast is that the Web will kill print media.

What are the common traits of survivor technologies? First, it seems, there is a core technology requirement: there must be some enduring advantage in the old technology that is not entirely supplanted by the new. But beyond that, it is the business decisions that matter most: investing to retool the traditional technology, adopting a new business model and nurturing a support network of loyal customers, industry partners and skilled workers.

The unfulfilled predictions of demise, experts say, tend to overestimate the importance of pure technical innovation and underestimate the role of business judgment. "The rise and fall of technologies is mainly about business and not technological determinism," said Richard S. Tedlow, a business historian at the Harvard Business School.

To survive, technologies must evolve, much as animal species do in nature. Indeed, John Steele Gordon, a business historian and author, observes that there are striking similarities in the evolutionary process of markets and biological ecosystems. Dinosaurs, he notes, may be long gone, victims of a change in climate that better suited mammals. But smaller reptiles evolved and survived, and today there are more than 8,000 species of reptiles, mainly lizards and snakes, compared with about 5,400 species of mammals.

As a media technology, radio is an evolutionary survivor. Its time as the entertainment hub of American households in the 1930s and '40s, captured in the Woody Allen film Radio Days, gave way to the rise of television.

TV replaced radio as the box families gathered around in their living rooms. Instead, radio adopted shorter programming formats and became the background music and chat while people ride in cars or do other things at home--"audio wallpaper," as Paul Saffo, a technology forecaster in Silicon Valley, puts it.

While television did pose a threat to movies, it also served as a prod to innovation, including failures like Smell-O-Vision but also wide-screen, rich-color technologies like Cinerama and CinemaScope. The idea--and a good one--was to give viewers a more vivid, immersive experience than they could possibly have with television.

Today movies, like other traditional media, face the digital challenge of the Internet. And Saffo is betting that after a period of adjustment and experimentation, they will make another life-prolonging adaptation.

"Technologies want to survive, and they reinvent themselves to go on," he said.

The survivors also build on their own technical foundations as well as the human legacy of people skilled in the use of a technology and the business culture and habits that surround it. And a change in the economic environment can sometimes lead to the renaissance of an older technology. Railroads, for example, have enjoyed a revival of investment recently as rising fuel costs and road congestion have prompted shippers to move from trucks to trains; some travelers, too, have opted for railways, along routes like the Boston-New York-Washington corridor.

The weight of legacy is underestimated, according to John Staudenmaier, editor of the journal Technology and Culture, because innovation is so often portrayed as a bold break with the past. A few stories of technological achievement fit that mold, like the Manhattan Project, but they are rare indeed.

The mainframe is the classic survivor technology, and it owes its longevity to sound business decisions. IBM overhauled the insides of the mainframe, using low-cost microprocessors as the computing engine. The company invested and updated the mainframe software, so that banks, corporations and government agencies could still rely on the mainframe as the rock-solid reliable and secure computer for vital transactions and data, while allowing it to take on new chores like running Web-based programs.

"The mainframe survived its near-death experience and continues to thrive because customers didn't care about the underlying technology," said Irving Wladawsky-Berger, who led the technical transformation of the mainframe in the early 1990s and is now a visiting professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Customers just wanted the mainframe to do its job at a lower cost, and IBM made the investments to make that happen."

IBM's most recent model, the z10, represents an investment of $1.5 billion and the work of 5,000 technical professionals. To nurture its ecosystem, the company partners with 400 universities worldwide in programs to teach mainframe skills.

The mainframe doomsayer, Alsop, is now a venture capitalist. In retrospect, he says, his 1991 prediction was wrong only in the timing. IBM has so drastically reinvented the mainframe technology and its business model that the mainframes he wrote about are long gone. "It is a different world," he said.

Entire contents, Copyright © 2008 The New York Times. All rights reserved.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Mainframes

Create an email alert | RSS feed
5 comments (Page 1 of 1)
"The company invested and updated the mainframe software, so that banks,...
by Commander_Spock March 23, 2008 10:50 PM PDT
... corporations and government agencies could still rely on the mainframe as the rock-solid reliable and secure computer for vital transactions and data, while allowing it to take on new chores like running Web-based programs...". It would have been good if IBM had done the same thing for the OS/2 Operating System; but wait - from: "OS2LDR and OS2KRNL -- The Secret Handshake": ( http://www.edm2.com/0703/hshk.html ); ( http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=/language_tools&u=http://ru.ecomstation.ru/showarticle.php?id=175 ); work on the "OS2LDR and OS2KRNL" may well be on the way by some "S-M-A-R-T" RUSSIANS that would likely see some "rolled heads/raised eyebrows" at Armonk and Redmond (for having held back on the enhancement of the OS/2 KERNEL for years). :-) ;-) :-) !
Reply to this comment
So, how goes the "State" of the "financial markets and much of global...
by Commander_Spock March 24, 2008 10:35 AM PDT
... commerce" including that of the U.S. Housing Market; since this article talks about - "Today, mainframe sales are a tiny fraction of the personal computer market. But with the mainframe facing extinction, IBM retooled the technology, cut prices and revamped its strategy. A result is that mainframe technology--hardware, software and services--remains a large and lucrative business for IBM, and mainframes are still the back-office engines behind the world's financial markets and much of global commerce". The big question is: Should not the U. S. Housing Loans which are taking the U. S. "financial markets" south be a "combination" of that of an "housing loan and "commercial" loan (re: for e-commerce...ya know, all those Back-To-Back Letters Of Credits....commerce) then the home-owners' desktops would mind the power of the IBM Mainframe against that of OS/2 Desktops with the sounds of Lotus "SYMPHONY". Against this background of "old technologies are still kicking" then it should be "very high marks" for the current U.S. Presidency. Just where lies the blame for the current "State Of The Union" - the "Banks" or the "High Tech Companies (IBM, INTEL...). :-) :-$ ;-) Long Lives OS/2!
Reply to this comment
Very, Very Interesting Reading: Bring It On!
by Commander_Spock March 24, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
From the below: "IBM from the ground up as the Personal Computer (PC) version of a mainframe operating system, with all of the time-slicing, stability, and other features previously existing solely on those high-end machines"!!! "Operating System/2 (OS/2) was originally developed as a joint project between IBM and Microsoft. It's intention was to replace the antiquated Disk Operating System (DOS) as the operating system of choice. At the time, DOS was at version 3.x, and IBM and Microsoft both realized that with the advent of the Intel 80286 in the mid-1980's, it was quickly becoming obsolete. Thus, OS/2 was born, initially as a 16-bit, command-line based operating system. Microsoft worked closely with IBM up to version 1.3. While IBM worked on the "guts," they worked on the new graphical user interface that was due for later versions. OS/2's kernel was developed by IBM from the ground up as the Personal Computer (PC) version of a mainframe operating system, with all of the time-slicing, stability, and other features previously existing solely on those high-end machines". http://www.os2bbs.com/os2news/OS2Warp.html As the main subject line reads; and, so does this one - these are "a million and one the reasons" "Why old technologies are still kicking". Bring It On. ;-) !
Reply to this comment
The mainframe survived because...
by krosavcheg March 25, 2008 5:17 PM PDT
Question? If I know that IBM wasn't the only maker of mainframes why doesn't the author of this article know that? Also IBM wasn't the only company to use microprocessors to replace the older technology but just like in the old days, the press is too blind to the rest of the story. The reason mainframes have survived is because of the huge amount of legacy code would have to be replaced and most companies are more interested in developing new code than redeveloping old code. And yes, Commander Spock is dangerously insane with his OS/2 obsession :)
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
7.8 earthquake stuns Chinese tech region
Patent Reform Act stalls in Senate
Early player leaves as Facebook goes corporate
Video: Monday QuickCast, 1st edition
RIM makes Bold Blackberry debut
Most Popular Stories
Google to launch Friend Connect for the social Web
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
RIM makes a Bold BlackBerry debut
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
A modest proposal to fix Dell's customer service
Resource center from News.com sponsors
You can do more when your phone runs Windows®
Windows Mobile

See it all at StartDoingMore.com Start Doing More

Start doing more
Get More Done with Windows Mobile

There's so much more you can do when your phone runs Windows. StartDoingMore.com>

Familiar Microsoft Software and Services

With a Windows Mobile phone, your easy-to-use Microsoft software go wherever you go.

Choose the perfect phone for you

Side, flip, qwerty, touchscreen? See More>

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.24%) 30.28 12,776.16
S&P 500 (0.07%) 0.99 1,389.27
NASDAQ (0.77%) 18.80 2,464.32
CNET TECH (0.35%) 5.96 1,730.24
  Symbol Lookup
Detroit auto show
Detroit auto show

Detroit auto show
advertisement
Click Here
On MP3.com: Worst MP3 Players of 2007
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: