- Related Stories
-
IBM founds coalition for 'smart' power grids
April 11, 2007 -
PG&E sees plug-in hybrids as potential profit centers
April 9, 2007 -
Supreme Court to consider climate change rules
November 29, 2006 -
Pumping power onto the grid from your basement
August 10, 2006
Like the Internet today, the electricity network needs to be able to connect billions of devices and still operate reliably. Because of growing environmental concerns, the grid needs to become far more flexible than it is today, accommodating distributed power generation from renewable sources and use several energy-efficiency techniques.
But while many people can agree on the vision of tomorrow's utility grid, few are willing to pay for it, according to experts who spoke at the Clean Energy Venture Summit on Tuesday.
A number of technologies need to be put in place to make the power grid smarter, notably more automation within the network and tools to give end users better information. But utilities are "grossly risk-averse and grossly hesitant to adopt new technology," said energy industry consultant Alison Silverstein.
"The utilities all want someone else to make the mistakes and take the risk (of adopting new technologies) for 5 or 10 years," Silverstein said. "And regulators are not willing to get out of their way and let them take those risks. It will require a transformation."
There are a handful of progressive utilities making long-term investments, but they are the exceptions, Silverstein said.
Representatives from two of them--Austin Energy in Texas and Pacific Gas & Electric in California--were on Tuesday's panel and said their companies are willing to spend money on energy conservation programs and incentives for renewable energy sources.
The overall change that the utility grid needs to make is to go from a centralized generation and distribution model to one that is more distributed and diverse, said Roger Duncan, deputy general manager at Austin Energy.
That means that peaks in demand on the utility grid will be offset by distributed renewable sources, such as solar panels feeding power into the grid. Demand management systems, another smart-grid feature, can automatically dial down the consumers' power consumption to prevent outages.
Austin Energy is one of many proponents of another potential smart-grid feature, plug-in hybrid vehicles that can be recharged at night, when demand is lower, and can act as a backup power supply for a home. The utility company also has one of the oldest green-building programs in the country.
But Austin Energy's dream to be more environmentally friendly is also the utility's nightmare, said Duncan.
Utilities are not necessarily adequately prepared to incorporate the many smart-grid technologies needed, he said. And the utility itself, like others in the industry, needs to wean itself from making nearly all its money from retail power generation and distribution.
"We haven't figured out the business models...(that) work well for the utility and the city government and the citizens," Duncan said. "Austin Energy has to figure out how to diversify its revenue sources."
How to build a smart grid
The primary problem with today's electricity distribution system is that wall sockets are the power equivalent of dumb terminals connected to a mainframe computer.
What's needed are access points that can be identified, much like how every computer device on the Internet has an Internet address, said Robert Howard, vice president of gas transmission and distribution at PG&E, who spoke on the utility panel.
With a smarter two-way communications mechanism between a power consumer and provider, both parties get far more control over consumption, he said.
PG&E could draw energy from the 15,000 solar installations in its regions rather than firing up an auxiliary power plant in the middle of a hot day, for example. Plug-in hybrids, which are hybrid cars with larger battery packs, can store about 10 kilowatts of power. Because the average home consumes about 2 kilowatts in an hour, that means a car battery could fuel a home for about five hours.
"Every device can be identified, not anonymous, and be addressable. Then the utility is fundamentally transformed," said Howard. "We can merge transportation with the utility network and fundamentally change the way we live and work."
At the Clean Energy Venture Summit, a few start-up companies pitched their smart-grid technologies to investors.
One company, Boulder, Colo.-based GridAgents, has developed a software system that allows utilities to better manage different kinds of distributed power generation, from solar panels to combined heat and power systems, said CEO David Cohen.
Another company, Silver Spring Networks, provides a way for utilities to monitor their networks, which would allow them to get notifications before a power outage. The key to smart grids is using the Internet protocol on home devices like power meters to shuttle information back and forth between the utility and the customer, said Eric Dresselhuys, Silver Spring's vice president of marketing and business development.
Greenhouse-gas regulations
The advantages of a smart-grid system for consumers is that they have better information about their power consumption and can make choices about purchasing contracts, Dresselhuys said. One consumer might be happy locking into a fixed rate, while others may try to reduce overall consumption by letting the utility tap into its storage, for example.
Silver Spring Networks is testing its system with Florida Power and Light, but Dresselhuys said that even with some activity in smart grids, resistance to the technology is high among both utilities and regulators.
"It's all about money. We tend to take a very short view; but if we would charge each customer less than two dollars per month, we could do everything we're talking about with smart grids," he said. However, regulators--as well as consumer advocacy groups--have shown that they will stand in the way of rate hikes imposed in order to upgrade the grid, he said.
Without a clear commitment to investing in upgrading the aging U.S. electrical grid, panelists suggested that regulations to restrict greenhouse gases could act as an impetus.
"We need that kind of pull to get the attention of the country, which would allow us to push forward," said Paul Thomas, president and CEO of Green Mountain Energy Company. "And it will get people willing to put up investments in technologies that allow us to achieve our vision."
A market-based system to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions could act "like a gun to the head" for regulators reluctant to take any bold measures, said energy-consultant Silverstein.
Brad Gammons, vice president of IBM's global energy and utilities industry group, said investors and energy company executives are counting on coming regulations around greenhouse-gas emissions. But overall the funding level from private and government sources is far lower than that for the rest of the world, he said.
"We're sitting on an aged, old infrastructure while emerging countries like India and China are moving to the next generation of networks and generation sources," he said.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
Environment and Energy
See more CNET content tagged:
grid,
power generation,
utility,
Texas,
vice president
- Smart ain't gonna help much
- Americans seem overly enthusiastic about each new gooney idea that comes down the pike. They don't ask questions until after the technology has received gross subsidies (like wind power and ethanol) and has gone down the road far enough for the gullibles to start realizing that those solutions : a) didn't actually solve anything, and b) have some bad side effects. The idea that I'm going to allow a utility to execute C/D cycles on my batteries and help wear them out is absurd. I also fail to see how one can put juice into a battery at night and then use it during peak daytime periods when the car isn't plugged in, or, at the very least, may be needed in the near future. If the utility is going to pay the customer for the wear and tear, why doesn't the utility buy the batteries themselves and have total control? This has all the earmarks of a very unthoughtout idea. As usual, no one will ever ask the hard questions before billions will be spent needlessly.
- Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
- What is the best way to store excess Solar Power?
- Do you just feed the power direct to the grid? What if a plant was large enough it had excess power? What happens when the sun stops shinning at night? Is it best to ship the power out to nearby towns during the day accounting for I squared R loss? or is best to store excess and use at night locally? Wasn't nanotechnology going to deal with improved grid technology? Lower losses?
- Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
- Funding Help
- I think the gas companies should help. They are raking in unrealistic profits.
- Reply to this comment
- Another Big Money/Lobby Industry
- These utility companies have trillions of dollars and would never spend the money to improve the efficiency of their distribution/generation. That would mean losing out on the revenue they earn from the inefficiency itself. They will never be forced to do so because they are in the top 5 of influential conglomerates whom control everything. 1. Oil 2. Insurance 3. Automakers 4. Big Tobacco 5. Utilities
- Reply to this comment View reply
- We are
- no where near that "pie in the sky" idea. While it is true the technology exists, there is no practical implementation. I work for a small rural electric coop. We are engaged in a project to automatically read all meters from the office. Today we are at 85%. Most of the residentials and natural gas wells are read in the office. This project has cost about $2million for our 2,000 customers/owners and the cost continues to rise. Do the math. Our debt is great. Rural electrical coops have led the way in such endeavers. But to think that somehow we can supply each home with a solar panal, somehow store the energy and then somehow backfeed it through the grid without subjecting us all to the poverty experienced by our stone aged ancestors is ludicrous. Not even Bill Gates and the U.S. could afford such an endeaver. I believe it was irresponsible and misleading of the person being interviewed and the WRITER to let people believe such an undertaking is achievable today or even in the next 50 yrs. Please do some homework first. Didn't they teach you that in journalism 101?
- Reply to this comment View reply
- What are you talking about?
- How difficult is it to understand that an electric vehicle can be charged overnight and used during the day? Obviously it will not be plugged in. Or am I misunderstanding something in your post? Also, the utility is not executing charge/discharge cycles on your vehicle. You are in control of that. You plug the car in at night, it gets charged. If the power goes out to your home, your home can automatically switch over to using the car's batteries as a power source. Think of your vehicle as a UPS for your entire home.
- Reply to this comment View reply
... or log in manually to your email client and click the link in our email. Once you have confirmed your registration, please log in.


