XP Starter under the gun

Even as Microsoft's low-cost version of Windows reaches more corners of the globe, some analysts are wondering whether it is hitting the mark.

The addition of a Spanish-language version this week means that Microsoft is now selling Windows XP Starter Edition, a localized adaptation of the full-fledged operating system, in a half-dozen languages in various emerging markets.

Critics say, however, that the software is still not flexible enough to really meet the needs of developing countries and individuals who live there.

News.context

What's new:
Microsoft's Windows XP Starter Edition, a localized version of the full-fledged program aimed at developing countries, is not flexible enough to meet the needs of people there, critics say.

Bottom line:
If the low-cost OS isn't meeting the mark, it could have implications for Microsoft's goal of getting 1 billion computer users worldwide.

More stories on this topic

To offer Starter Edition for far less than other versions of Windows XP without hurting its existing business, Microsoft imposed a number of restrictions, such as the fact the program can only open three windows at a time.

"I think someone who has any experience with a PC is going to start hitting the limitations pretty quickly," said Gartner analyst Michael Silver.

That, however, gets at one of the toughest things to figure out about Windows XP Starter Edition--who the target customer is. Identifying that person will help Microsoft reach its goal of getting a billion PC users, largely by upping computer usage in emerging countries such as Brazil, India and Russia.

Microsoft says the software, which is offered only as part of a budget system, is aimed chiefly at first-time computer users--those who have never really interacted with Windows. For that reason, the company has poured most of its development resources into things like local language videos that explain PC basics, such as how to print and how to use a mouse.

"It is the soul of Windows XP Starter Edition," said Mike Wickstrand, a director of Windows product management who helps lead the Starter Edition effort. "It's the part we've invested the most in."

But critics say the people in developing countries most likely to be able to afford a computer--even an affordable one with Starter--are middle-income residents who may well use a PC at work. Such customers may be more computer-savvy and less likely to buy a product with limitations. In a report last year, Gartner researchers said that while Starter Edition showed potential, it was unlikely to have much impact until its shortcomings were addressed.

"Microsoft will make little progress in the market with this product, as indicated by key PC vendors' adoption plans," Gartner analysts Dion Wiggins and Martin Gilliland wrote in an October report. Early signs appear to bear their conclusion out.

In general, Microsoft has been working with smaller, locally based computer makers in the countries where Starter has been offered. However, Dell is among the PC manufacturers that have signed on for the effort in Mexico.

The software maker has also concentrated its push in countries, such as Thailand, where the government is looking to play a central role in expanding PC usage. Microsoft announced plans to offer Starter

CONTINUED: ...
Page 1 | 2 | 3
More from News.com on this story's topics

Latin America

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Windows XP

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Asia

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Microsoft

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
developing country, Microsoft Windows XP, critic, Gartner Inc., PC company

88 comments (Page 1 of 2)
no-one wants XP
by Scott W June 30, 2005 6:20 AM PDT
nobody wants a cut-down overpriced OS when they can get a fully functional windows XP for nothing (could windows be classed as fully functional). the governments are also trying to promote linux and if people want to avoid piracy then they can get that for nothing as well. ms can't compete with a superior product that is also better can they?
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
They don't get it
by June 30, 2005 6:25 AM PDT
3 Window limitation? Omg. If you choose linux you can have free of charge: 1. An operating system without any imposed limitations (including but not restricted to: number of processors/architectures, processes, installations, users) 2. Office suites ( Openoffice,Koffice, Goffice ) 3. Multimedia ( Cd burning, Filmplayers, Music players, encoders etc.) 4. Games (from arcade to full 3D) 5. Network capability with some very powerful tools (iptables for instance) 6. Internationalisation. Linux is availiable in more languages than most other OS-es. 7. If you're lucky a linux guru who is so bent on promoting his OS that he installs and configures it to your needs or you can use the easy install interfaces. 2 clicks for an installation for example. And yes you can have this for free and spend the extra $ that Microsoft would have stolen from you to feed your children or buy extra hardware. I am fully aware that this post is advertising on behalf of Linux but since cnet only advertises Microsoft (and I'd love to have even 1% of the sum they get for it) I felt compelled to advertise linux. Having installed around 40-50 systems with linux on some computers through a government funded program to equip the poorer people with computers I had a choice of: a. ) windows home edition in english b. ) any linux I chose in the local language So I opted for linux since it already has games/programming and office application while windows had as far as I noticed viruses and adware availiable free of charge :P Let the flamewar begin. But I know I'm right.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Why does the "Starter Edition" exist?
by June 30, 2005 6:51 AM PDT
I'm afraid I don't see the logic of "Windows Starter Edition". Is it really to appeal to developing countries? Developing countries are frequently cash-strapped. Windows XP is a silly choice for widespread use because of the (relatively speaking) hefty resource requirements -- you want something that can run on the commodity hardware of yesteryear. Forget spending cash on licenses, and software has to be REALLY cheap to be considered. "Developing country" probably means that they don't speak the Yankees' English, so the platform and the majority of the apps need to be localized. And do you really want to spend the time and effort having to establish a regime for and regulations to handle the peculiarities of the corporate American style licensing of software? What would suggest Microsoft's products over other solutions if you don't already have large legacy Microsoft-based infrastructure to support? I guess the preceding paragraph is largely rhetorical, since a number of developing nations have already put together well-reasoned plans for infrstructure and deployment of computer systems in their countries. I suppose the real question is, if Microsoft's already the underdog there, coming to the table late, why would they bring something so limited (at higher cost)? The Windows logo simply doesn't carry much weight in countries where the greater part of the population hasn't ever used a computer.
Reply to this comment View reply
Do these countries even need household PC's?
by Bob_Barker June 30, 2005 7:31 AM PDT
Do these countries even need household PC's? I have a hard time believing some banana farmer (forgive my geralized term but it's merely an example) from wherever is going to care about computers. Even if they had one they'd probably be playing solitaire like the rest of us. It seems to me like people are forcing them to adapt and/or change to the standards of the industrialized world. These so called "critics" of this Starter Edition are scaling their needs against the product, not the banana farmer's. Perhaps Microsoft reasons that by limiting the number of windows open will reduce the confusion of the first time user. The limit may also be there so the user doesn't over task "hardware of yester-year" resulting in sluggish or undesireable performance. A big issue if you're new to computers. If the computer starts operating undesirebly a new user will most likely think it's their fault. Now I'm no fanboi of MS or Linux or any other OS but doesn't forcing a company to change their product seem a bit wrong? It's like telling a auto manufacturer that we only allow cars with 3 wheels here, and they have to have go 0-60 in 4 seconds and have cost less than 10k.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Can't use notepad with it
by sanenazok June 30, 2005 7:56 AM PDT
You can't use notepad because it's so easy to open more than three windows, just when you want to change printer settings: Click on File=>Page Setup then Click the Printer Button and Click Properties. Whoops, can't do that since that would be your fourth window. That shows you how useful this is. This thing's competition isn't no OS (since there's Linux) it's not even no Windows (since pirated copies are everywhere especially in the poorer countries). These limits on use are particularly annoying since programs are not designed to minimize window use. Instead, what MS should have done is sold an updated Windows Me or something else like that to those countries. Me is about the same level of uselessness as a tied down XP, except it will not make the computer a shareware toy.
Reply to this comment View reply
THEY WILL LOOK BACK AT US AND WONDER WHY MICROSOFT MADE SO MUCH MONEY
by MITCHIND June 30, 2005 9:11 AM PDT
I have never been a Microsoft fan and in my small business I try and use as little as possible. The operating system and Office suite is so mediocre. I have been a long time user of Lotus Smartsuite and except for it medicore filters for saving in Microsoft file formats it has always been so far head. I take at elast twice as long to do a Word layour than a Word Pro and the formating is so much better in Lotus. If i was driving down the road and I saw Bill Gates and Steve Balmer on the side of the road broken down I would have to stop and say SORRY but you are on your own and I cannot help them. I would really do this because the operating system that we have as a collective race stupidly accepted wastes so much of my time and in 15 years in business has cost me proably more than 1000 hours fighting with system medicority, limitations and poor performance and there are alternatives. In some articles I read when the anti trust cases were going on in the USA I saw one state had a large accounting house who had assessed that picking this stuff would mean a senior officer of a company would not be meeting their fuduciary requirements to the company, and considering the time they waste that conclusion does not suprise me. What really amazed me with these hearings is that why they did not make Microsoft allow the competitors to make it so that Microsoft Office applications not have decent filters for opening and saving in other formats. This is one of the biggest ways they force people like me in small business to have to buy their office applciations as people i send data to cannot open a Word Pro document for example. Stuff removing the media player why cant these high priced lawyers for the anti trust cases really help competitors move in and do something about the opening and saving formats
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Critics, huh?
by 201293546946733175101343322673 June 30, 2005 10:28 AM PDT
I see, maybe those so-called "critics" are losers in life, because they can only criticize and cannot make any single positive contribution in the society :)
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
"Critics say..."
by June 30, 2005 10:36 AM PDT
"Critics say..." There seems to be a trend in the modern era that makes people think that if they want to be seen as intelligent and in-the-know, they have to criticize things. In reality, thats the intellectually lazy way out. Anyone can criticize anything. Its not a sign of intelligence, just a sign of someone who likes to complain. If this version of windows is SO bad, then it will fail. But if it doesnt, will CNET follow up with these critics and ask them if they were full of crap?
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
Let's get down to what it really means.
by Thomas, David June 30, 2005 11:09 AM PDT
The Windows XP starter edition is nothing more than a technical slap in the face for its' "targeted" customers. Who in there right mind would ever want an intentional limited OS, with the obvious goal of making actual computer use so painful that you yearn to buy an upgrade?! It seems as though Microsoft delivered this edition because they were forced to and were pissed about it. Hmmmmm. No defense against Microsoft, but when I have a client who forces me to do something on some crazy timeline, I give them exactly what they asked for, nothing more, nothing less. Any experienced developer knows that taking this approach meets your commitment, but always results in an inferior product. Only in this instance, Microsoft took pains to make it more painful by cutting corners in areas not stipulated. The ONLY result of such tactics by Microsoft will be to drive the majority of its intended audience to other solutions. It is a prime example of how they truly do business, and it worked when they dealt with other businesses. But when you are attempting to win over individual customers with a free will, this is a disaster. Three windows at a time?! Are you kidding?! I didn't need to read the rest of the article when after I read that. Now I am purely interested in finding out what the complete list of limitations are. It is dumbfounding to see Microsoft hold onto there bloated profit growth at the expense of their future. Their expansive growth, and cash rich profits were mind-blowing, But EVERY business hits a plateau. They have made enough money to practically give the OS away, and concentrate on their applications and grow them. But that is all together a separate issue, hampered by greed and huge benefits. Microsoft is experiencing a kind of tunnel vision which can be directly attributed to Gates and Ballmer. Once again, I am no fan of Microsoft, but I believe they are at a true cross-roads when they produce something like the Windows XP starter edition and attempt to pass it off as something beneficial. They need new leadership, but since I am not a fan, maybe they should keep it up.
Reply to this comment
Microsoft vs Linux
by pythonhacker June 30, 2005 1:18 PM PDT
Among these 39 posts I found 25 pro Linux, about 9-10 pro M$ and 4-5 neutral or useless. If CNET posters represent a cross section of educated computer users in the world, M$ has something to worry about. I am a regular reader of Microsoft related articles at CNET. This pattern seems to be quite common now a days in the comments. The number of M$ supporting posts are decreasing. Way to go Tux!
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
7.8 earthquake stuns Chinese tech region
Patent Reform Act stalls in Senate
Early player leaves as Facebook goes corporate
Video: Monday QuickCast, 1st edition
RIM makes Bold Blackberry debut
Most Popular Stories
Google to launch Friend Connect for the social Web
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
RIM makes a Bold BlackBerry debut
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
A modest proposal to fix Dell's customer service
Resource center from News.com sponsors
Aligning CIO & CEO visions
What CIOs need to know

Click Here!
It's a simple truth. The closer you and your CEO see things, the greater your chance for success. Our exclusive report can help you get there—and help your business grow. Get the report featuring the views of 765 CEOs on innovation. learn more

Click Here!
What CEOs think: Innovation Insights for CIOs

Learn How CIOs can deliver strategic success for their enterprises

The New CIO: Beyond Technology

Learn how CIOs become heroes

"Change Catalyst: How Technology Innovations Transformed the Entertainment Business."

Learn about the impact of technology in strategy execution

The future of the Enterprise

Read more about tomorrow's organization

SF Giants CIO Bill Schlough discusses new technology upgrades at AT&T Park

Watch the CIO Vision Series Video

How virtualization saves big bucks

Qualcomm CIO explains how his company saved about $15 million

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Microsoft (1.16%) 0.34 29.73
Dow Jones Industrials (0.49%) 62.36 12,808.24
S&P 500 (0.39%) 5.39 1,393.67
NASDAQ (0.77%) 18.92 2,464.44
CNET TECH (0.66%) 11.34 1,735.62
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On TechRepublic: Soaring gas prices = more remote workers
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: