Perspective: Must employers really pay to play?

perspective While there is truth to the old adage that "you've gotta pay to play," many companies are building compensation packages in a vacuum, with little, or no connection to actual business goals. In fact, throwing money around--in the form of substantial CEO pay packages and recruitment signing bonuses--is not doing much to improve business success or employee retention.

With executive churn on the upswing, attracting and retaining talent more than ever remains a top corporate priority. Indeed, companies say they are increasingly worried about recurring talent shortages--and for good reason. Less than 25 percent of the businesses Authoria surveyed said they were doing a good job leveraging compensation to attract and retain high quality employees--let alone aligning performance with business objectives.

This nation is in the middle of a talent crisis. The U.S. is estimated to face a 10 million worker shortage in 2010; the 500 largest companies are expected to lose 50 percent of their senior management in five years and the average tenure at one employer for U.S. employees is only three years. An extensive study by research and advisory firm Bersin & Associates last May showed that due to economic growth, demographic shifts (retirement of baby boomers) and new workforce values, organizations are experiencing an unprecedented corporate talent squeeze.

While appropriate and competitive compensation is absolutely critical, it needs to be part of a larger strategy for better evaluating, engaging, growing and retaining talent. Left on its own, compensation may ensure well-paid individual employees. But it doesn't engender loyalty.

In fact, many companies are finding success in presenting and promoting overall rewards packages that demonstrate broader value to the employee. On many corporate employee Web sites, these "total rewards" pages garner the heaviest traffic, even though they don't change often.

Compensation is certainly part of the overall package, but it has been proven over and over again that it is not enough.

Conversations we've had with customers highlight the fact that with recent graduates, short-term money isn't what motivates them. They're looking at a lot of different things, particularly a company philosophy and culture that reflects their lifestyle. In a recent conversation with one of our large financial customers--reflective of what we've heard across our customer base--it was mentioned that the customer spends significant time and energy emphasizing the uniqueness of its corporate culture. It then wraps this culture around a set of compensation attributes, which aren't just related to pay.

This trend is equally as important from a manager's perspective. Another customer, a multinational bottling company, has tightly integrated compensation with performance management and career development. As a result, line managers often remark that people management has become more strategic and much more efficient. They feel more confident in guiding career paths, as well as identifying and retaining those with leadership potential--and the benefits are apparent at all levels of the company.

The best companies to work for as identified annually by Fortune magazine achieve low turnover and motivated workforces by establishing top-down initiatives. Winning programs require creativity and engagement to build loyalty. Successful strategies include employee-driven career development; the flexibility to explore new opportunities within the organization; ongoing training and learning; telecommuting and part-time options that match lifestyles and don't "demotivate" employees by curtailing roles or benefits; alignment among corporate, business unit, manager and employee goals and objectives; and encouragement of personal passions and pursuits such as volunteer work. Setting values--such as integrity, accountability, teamwork and respect--guides behavior, drives decisions and shapes the environment. Creating recognition and awards for all levels within the organization drives enthusiasm and the desire to excel.

Workforces are increasingly complex and borderless. Baby boomer veterans are mixed with Generation X and Yers, all providing value, delivering unique perspectives and requiring different motivators. Companies should ask themselves who drives the corporate value--is it only top management? Do we know who our high potential workers are today and who our future leaders will be tomorrow?

Successful companies are skilled at identifying talent within their globally diverse populations. Forward-thinking organizations such as Hess Corporation know that key roles, such as the engineers in the field, are critical to their success and have developed performance management and employee engagement programs to involve all levels.

Compensation is certainly part of the overall package but it has been proven over and over again that it is not enough. If they want to attract and retain motivated employees, organizations need to invest the time and resources to make talent management their number one priority.

Biography
Tod Loofbourrow is founder and CEO of Authoria.

More Perspectives

More from News.com on this story's topics

Benefits

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Recruiting

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Salaries

RSS feed

Leadership

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Authoria, compensation, career development, talent, workforce

8 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Boo hoo
by CompEng October 25, 2007 5:33 AM PDT
Maybe if companies still believed in training, planning ahead more than 5 years (heck, even that long), or hiring smart people rather than just-in-time skillsets, they might not have to spin this little road bump as a crisis. Considering the short term thinking and herd mentality of American business, I don't think the current round of management has really set the bar that high anyway. Although that is really a product of the nearly lassez-faire capitalist incentive system, isn't it? Anyway, considering how corporate lobbyists have helped screw the American worker, I have a distinct lack of sympathy that senior management predicts a shortfall of younger buddies.
Reply to this comment View reply
Love it
by alflanagan October 25, 2007 7:00 AM PDT
I'm always amused to see employers complaining about a shortage of talent. The real problem is a shortage of talent at the price they're willing to pay. Spread some of those $10 million dollar CEO bonuses around on the people who actually produce what your business sells. You'll get the talent. And just maybe standards of living will start to rise again.
Reply to this comment View reply
Then Come the Lay-Offs...
by fred dunn October 25, 2007 8:49 AM PDT
The same thing happened in '98-2000 during the Y2K hiring craze. One Large Insurance company (which will remain anonymous) was offering almost double but at least 50% more than what they were making at large reputable companies. We being a university lost a lot of talent to them. BUT then came mid-2000, after the crisis was over and immediately 1200 people were layed-off. There were subsequent smaller grouping layoffs after that almost up until the present. Pay talent but don't break the back of the company doing it. For those that are looking at another job and find one that pays a good deal more than the average than you can bet there will be a price to pay later. If you don't mind job hopping then more power to you, go for the highest paying enterprise that barcodes your forehead. Otherwise remember you are only worth what you can contribute to the company. If you bargain them up too high then they will just use you as long as they need you and then let you go.
Reply to this comment
About time
by Too Old For IT October 25, 2007 10:03 AM PDT
All the passed over older guys (35-45 then, 50-60 now), kicked to the curb dot-comers and so forth are just sitting on the sidelines. Running their own companies, out of IT altogether, we laugh at silly companies lead by over-compensated CEOs now scrambling for talent. Talent is out there, doing something else. And no company ever got out of a need-to-pay-to-play situation by giving the CEO a bigger package. For the right money, talent will come back to IT, students will choose it as an education path, and so forth. Forget "total compensation", just show me the money ... and a low-paid CEO as well, because C-Level management is just there for show anyway. Show mw a place where line managers have a depth of experience the brought them there. Show me a place where idiot managers are cut out and fired. And the money, let us not forget that.
Reply to this comment
Throwing money at management does not work
by chash360 October 25, 2007 11:01 AM PDT
Upper managers and CEO's are getting more and more pay. Meanwhile lower tier employees (you know, the ones that actually have the skills, training and do the work), have only seen their pay remain flat or decrease, benefits like health care have continued to decline, and cost of living has definately increased. The unemployement numbers lie, the numbers only reflect those recently unemployed, and after unemployment benefits run out, their numbers drop off count, even if they are still not employed. There is no shortage of skilled labor, but there is a fear of outsourcing. Who wants to spend thousands on a degree, or career in IT when companies just ship the jobs overseas? The numbers don't add up, and they have tried to hide it by classifying fast food workers as 'manufacturing' jobs. If you take away the fast food workers you will begin to realize that corperate and political America has sold American workers out to the lowest bidder. I make only 2/3 of the going rate for someone of my qualifications in my position, the only reason I put up with that is that I like my job, and I don't really have much other choice where I live. We complain and complain about the lack of raises and cost of living increases, and upper management just lines their pockets, and large shareholder pockets, with the money that would retain talented employees. When you need talented, skilled employees, you are not talking about management. Management does not get the work done, they (hopefully) provide the proper environment for the work to be done. They have been doing a lousy job at it, becuase they won't do the one thing that will work, pay your skilled work force. Does any Fortune 500 company offer true profit sharing anymore (percentage of net profit going to every employee in good standing). No, this too has gone into upper management and major share holders hands, with no sign of changing. I have already saved my employer more money than they will ever pay me in my lifetime, with my talents, skills, quick thinking, and efficient use of resources. I have nifty little printed awards around my desk, and thats probably all I will ever get, unless the culture changes. I Love my work and my job, but believe me, if the compensation situation does not improve, the moment I can make a go of it, self employed, I will. I have already begun my plans because there is no more job security, no matter how talented and skilled you are, it won't protect your job, when the board of directors decide they can no longer suck enough money out of the company the way it is, and decide to ship your pathetically paid (premium in their eyes) job, to a third world country sweat shop.
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Early player leaves as Facebook goes corporate
RIM unveils BlackBerry Bold/BlackBerry 9000
HelioVolt claims CIGS solar efficiency mark
Virtual worlds for pre-schoolers? They're here
Powerset brings the Semantic Web to Wikipedia
Most Popular Stories
Google to launch Friend Connect for the social Web
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
A modest proposal to fix Dell's customer service
Did you get infected? Virus runs amok amid JavaOne
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.94%) -120.90 12,745.88
S&P 500 (-0.67%) -9.40 1,388.28
NASDAQ (-0.23%) -5.72 2,445.52
CNET TECH (-0.64%) -11.13 1,724.28
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On GameFAQs: Pokemon Dungeon: Time FAQs & more!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: