• On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
March 25, 2008 2:41 PM PDT

Google shareholders to vote on censorship, human rights

Posted by Elinor Mills
  • Print

For the second year in a row, Google shareholders will be asked to hold the Web search giant accountable for protecting free speech, regardless of international borders.

Googleworld

One of the proposals to be submitted at the annual shareholder meeting scheduled for May 8, would require Google to create policies to protect freedom of access to the Internet, according to the company's proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and released publicly on Tuesday.

"Technology companies in the United States have failed to develop adequate standards by which they can conduct business with authoritarian governments while protecting human rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression," the proposal states.

The measure would require that Google: not host data that can identify individual users in Internet restricting countries; resist demands for censorship; inform users when it has censored content; and tell users about its data-retention practices.

The proposal is similar to one Google shareholders rejected a year ago that would have prohibited Google from proactively censoring itself.

The measure is being submitted by the St. Scholastica Monastery and the Office of the Comptroller of New York City, which serves as the custodian of the pension and retirement funds for city employees, teachers, police and fire department and the board of education.

A second proposal would establish a board committee on human rights that would review and make recommendations regarding human rights issues raised by the company's activities and policies. That proposal comes from Harrington Investments, which manages assets for institutional and individual investors and specializes in socially responsible investing.

Google's board is recommending that shareholders reject both of the measures.

The proposals are timely, in light of China's recent ban of YouTube because of clips showing protesters in Tibet, and a YouTube ban in Pakistan that triggered a two-hour global blackout of the popular video-sharing site.

While Yahoo has received the harshest criticism after its cooperation with Chinese authorities led to arrests of Internet journalists, complaints about Google's policies started in earnest two years ago when Google began censoring Web searches in China.

The proxy statement also includes other nuggets of information. For instance, Google's board adopted a policy in October that specifies the company will only enter into transactions with family members when the transaction is in the best interests of the company. Last year Google invested more than $4 million in 23andMe, a company targeting Web-based genetics tools that was started by Anne Wojcicki, the wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin. That financing was reviewed and approved by Google's Audit Committee.

The board also approved spending $1.1 million--$7,000 per hour--to charter a corporate jet for executives to fly in last year.

Also permitted were: Google's sponsorship of the Google Lunar X Prize, a $30 million international competition to land a robot on the moon; $1 million in financing for Comsenz, a provider of social-networking software and hosted services for Web sites in China; and the $20.3 million acquisition last year of PeakStream, developer of a software application platform for multiprocessor systems.

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
Recent posts from News Blog
NASA, Google Maps track Southern California wildfires
Sprint first to offer HTC Touch Pro
Flipping out: RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 debuts
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Woman to virtual ex: 'I won't be ignored!'
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments
Whatever happened to "Do no evil?"
by partytildawn-20159620461052270 March 26, 2008 12:18 AM PDT
Asking shareholders to reject these propositions flies in the face of the Google tongue-and-cheek "Do no evil" motto, does it not?
Reply to this comment
Re:"Do no evil?"
by cholinms March 26, 2008 7:16 AM PDT
Of course the board doesn't want these passed. The "Do no evil" is for corporate image only. "Do no evil" is a hell of a lot less profitable than the other way around.
advertisement

In the news now

A tech veteran responds to the recession

LogLogic's Patricia Sueltz heard a clear message about the economy from investors, but she already knows a thing or two about navigating through tough times.


Obama's AG pick on privacy

Eric Holder has criticized the warrantless wiretapping program, but his views on other online policies may not be that far from those of the Bush administration.


About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right